Message from @propyne

Discord ID: 483019778794192918


2018-08-25 21:02:50 UTC  

mass x speed x speed

2018-08-25 21:03:06 UTC  

and that's energy, not penetration

2018-08-25 21:03:08 UTC  

= force

2018-08-25 21:03:15 UTC  

= "penetration"

2018-08-25 21:03:25 UTC  

No.

2018-08-25 21:03:44 UTC  

Those are parts of the Terminal Ballistic Effect equations not the hole Cwow

2018-08-25 21:04:14 UTC  

@Crow there's more to going through kevlar and wall respectively than just the energy

2018-08-25 21:04:27 UTC  

otherwise a strong punch would go through kevlar

2018-08-25 21:04:40 UTC  

Also included are things like Bullet design, diameter, and media being shot at

2018-08-25 21:04:45 UTC  

^

2018-08-25 21:05:21 UTC  

a strong punch DOES go through kevlar, which is why blunt trauma is a thing

2018-08-25 21:05:34 UTC  

but it doesn't penetrate

2018-08-25 21:05:46 UTC  

there isn't a hole in the kevlar

2018-08-25 21:05:51 UTC  

Jacketed Hallow Points do better against flesh than kevlar, but can weigh the same as a full metal jacket that does do better against the kevlar than the flesh

2018-08-25 21:05:53 UTC  

>and you're plain wrong, barrier penetration improves with mass, not speed
This is what I'm arguing against

2018-08-25 21:05:56 UTC  

fundamentally

2018-08-25 21:06:43 UTC  

barrier penetration improves with mass AND speed, as well as a hundred smaller factors like shape (not really relevant to this argument)

2018-08-25 21:06:44 UTC  

toss a baseball at a wall, now THROW the baseball at the wall, same mass, does the extra speed help it go deeper??

2018-08-25 21:07:08 UTC  

kek

2018-08-25 21:07:42 UTC  

a baseball thrown does not have enough energy to penetrate a wall generally speaking

2018-08-25 21:08:09 UTC  

Strong throw that goes through a wall... Sure it will, but a heavy baseball going fast is still going through more layers than a light baseball going REALLY fast

2018-08-25 21:08:31 UTC  

a drop a cannon ball from 1y, now SHOOT the cannon ball at a wall with the same mass

2018-08-25 21:09:08 UTC  

There was a test they did where they took drywall sheets lined up behind one another and shot it with various calibers

2018-08-25 21:09:17 UTC  

mass x speed x speed

2018-08-25 21:09:54 UTC  

more energy, less inertia my dude, and inertia is what you need for the wall

2018-08-25 21:09:59 UTC  

speed (velocity) is a lot more important than mass

2018-08-25 21:10:32 UTC  

which is why a few gram heavy bullet can REKK your body armor and kill you

2018-08-25 21:10:43 UTC  

The other part of it Proyne is that I have in more modern handgun loads (JHPs) in particular they are using fast burn powders these days so in a long barrel (over 14") you are losing muzzle Velocity.

2018-08-25 21:11:08 UTC  

as the long as the bullet is going SANIC FAST supersonic speeds

2018-08-25 21:11:35 UTC  

>you are losing muzzle Velocity.

2018-08-25 21:11:38 UTC  

I call bullshit

2018-08-25 21:12:49 UTC  

you might get no measurable improvement in muzzle velocity, but I find it VERY hard to believe you would lose muzzle velocity

2018-08-25 21:14:03 UTC  

.44MAG lever gun chronos faster as SBR than a Carbine

2018-08-25 21:14:03 UTC  

for that to happen, the pressure from the atmosphere outside would have to be higher than that inside barrel

2018-08-25 21:14:40 UTC  

there's friction from the barrel, you know

2018-08-25 21:15:18 UTC  

Now if you were to up that to a 20" plus barrel it would really lose the MV

2018-08-25 21:16:09 UTC  

14" to 16.5" will cause about 10 to 20% depending on the powder,

2018-08-25 21:16:37 UTC  

yeah but that requires an insane scenario where the barrel friction is equal to or greater than the pressure difference between a figurative gunpowder explosion and NTP

2018-08-25 21:17:04 UTC  

you have no idea how high friction gets at near-sonic speeds gets do you

2018-08-25 21:17:11 UTC  

But if you go to a slow burn powder it will result in the traditional increased MV in up to 18" barrel

2018-08-25 21:17:13 UTC  

a simple way to visualize this: