I counter that with something I heard from a weird MTV cartoon called "THE MAXX"

"a democrat is just a conservative who hasnt been mugged yet"

lol

@Juniper_Postal that's fudd-talk

exercising your right is a perfectly good reason

Well it was a shitty 90s mtv cartoon. So its logic is more a joke then to make a point. But it still sorta works.

and besides, if shtf, you've just made yourself an asset

Isnt that the same if you have no capacity to defend your self if sthf?

?

Your ether so gunned people target you. or so weak people prey on you? then again this entire concept is on the premise that civil control will end the second that.... Okay... uh

I was gonna say when the bombs drop

but realistically if that happened no one would be left

just the roaches asking "what happened?"

No, the premise of shtf is gov't goes full retard

You need the Guns to defend against Gouvernment Tyranny

And if they don't know you have a Barrett, you're good

Hence opposition to registration and such

I could say the same for someone with 40 gallons of gas and a lot of empty bottles and a penchant for arson

You cant really regulate jerrycans

And you can't regulate guns

Literally, you can't

thats why the whole gun thing is stupid

mind you such a person would prob burn them selves to death quicker then someone with a gun would shoot them selves

unlike bullets which need to be aimed. fire doesnt give a fuck

people who wanna kill other people will find a way

I agree with that

A sledge hammer or butcher knife can kill just as easily.

and btw, using a truck to run over a crowd is way cheaper, easier and more efficient then getting guns

Right, but why make the self defense needlessly complicated?

Sledgehammer is a bit unwieldy and knife is liable to get you stabbed

unfortunately what they have in the kitchen or garage is all most folks who dont believe in owning guns are gonna have and they arnt gonna get far Id assume against an armed gun wielding group.

Well, that's their problem

Unless they are like that dude from "dont breath"

Can't force someone to be armed

But you can force them to stand down with overwhelming force of arms

Unless they are stupid and wish to die in a hail of gunfire trying to recreate rambo

Though then there is the Las Vegas shooter, who do a lot with his guns, 60-ish people was it?

And that's the point of citizens being armed

@da britian something's fishy about that guy

I dont wanna give the vegas guy any clout . But for all his stuff

Bad example