the accuracy is *why* it's better

videos with white noise getting falsely content-ided is what protected them

yes

thats not happening anymore

and more accurate systems to detect copyrighted content is why

they feel more safe so they don't let as many videos slip through the cracks

that means if a copyright holder goes to youtube and says "get rid of this or we sue you" they have a better chance of doing it accurately

they have been doing that forever

accurately

ok

accuracy is good

no

it isint

are you a poe?

it means they are following the DMCA and relevant US copyright laws

which is good

youtube has less liability because of the DMCA

nigga that doesent mean they are going to respect fair use

they do though

people were waiting months for counter DMCAs to go through

now it takes weeks at most

and even when Google makes an incorrect verdict

you are liable

Ping's mostly correct here

The purpose of the DMCA is to protect a platform based on the procedures

As long as they follow the procedure outlined by the DMCA, they cannot get sued because of participants on their platform.

That prevents Youtube from getting sued, Server farms from getting sued, Etc. Etc.

Now, youtube's had to tweak their policies a little bit

But when someone gets a DMCA through youtube now

they're given a notice, and a realistic period to respond

If they respond, they either take down the video, or submit a counter-claim.

The point of this, is that the claimant is now legally engaged with the creator of the video.

instead of the company(ies) hosting it.

From there, it's up to the claimant to decide to bring it to court or not.

http://prntscr.com/iv3rop safe harbor

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/512

Clarification is necessary, was that a rebuttal?

The screenshot, I mean.

logicly if youtube has the ability to monitor copyright data then they have not only the ability to find it on their platform after its been uploaded but i think at some point it will be argued they should assign a function of its service design rather than as requested by the copy right claiment. and by that i mean not that a copyright holder should not need to tell youtube to enforce their copyright but however that the standard of enforcing that copyright by the service would be raised to a level that the system permanently checks for it until the copyright is no longer valid

bascly using the demonitization bot as a copyright bot

See, I do disagree to the point that they try to automate the system