Not that they liked men, but considered male build naturally more aesthetically appealing

ahhaha

From an atistic, idealistic point of view

makes more sense that way

artistic

autistic?

😃

the greeks were blantant boy-lovers

😄

indeed

they were, it's kind of fucked up.

Men's bodies are more muscular and curvy actually then women's, which apart from private parts, are quite flat and boring

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/japanese-company-manufactures-lifelike-child-sex-dolls-for-paedophiles-a6811046.html

😦

😦

:0

That's why artists prefered portrayals of rather muscular bodies

i think it was also because it was a better way to show off their skills

Yup

And mind you, not only bodies, but their posture was also made more manly

fucks are encouring pedophiles?

hmm

They would look disinterested, have serious faces, gazing straight forward

interesting stuff

noticeable in old art

with dignity and pride, something that's manly

as i look

IMO, and it might be controversial, female sensuality was considered tasteless for artists of old

hmm

why do you say that

does that go along with how women were treated in history

pretty much since day one.

Subconciouss

only in recent times have women become more and more =

more and more what?

=

Letting yourself consmed by pleasure of soft, female portrayal, was nurturing of weakness

equal.

hahahhaah

weak?

that shit is MMMMM MMM GOOOD