idk, I didn't ask. But they blamed the US for the refugee situation

it's like, they play with everything whenever convinient, but don't even think with logic anymore

i once had someone blame the US for the fact that europe is being jammed full of refugees

claiming that every single relatively safe middle eastern and north african country was full 🤔 and also that everyone coming to europe was actually from syria 🤔

havent the us been destabilizing their countries for a long time though?

I thought you were gonna say they also approved intervention in Syria

coz that's my problem with it

we have, but there's a lot of space between morocco and pakistan

they can't blame it on the US and still defend intervention anyway

right

but i get the impression the u.s. foreign policy has certainly contributed a lot

in combination with the un probably

there's certainly more available space in the islamic countries of the world than there is in europe

it did

but I find it disingenuous that they are all against war, but then totally for it for "human rights". But even when they are for it, they use the consequences for socialism and blame the right

like, i think following bush into the middle east was a dumb idea

but the idea that the US is responsible for Europe's immigration policy is ridiculous

true

if europe said no, they'd just go somewhere else

unless the u.s. controls the e.u.

it's not like the entirety of the middle east and north africa is some hellish landscape

hell, my parents went to morocco a couple months ago

not the entirety, but most of it

subsaharan africa definitely is.

*1933 intensifies*

Eh, Botswana & Namibia is doing Okay.

so they are pro gun?

I mean, you cant regulate guns (or nukes for that matter) if you have anarchy, can you?

in order for anarchy to exist, you must enforce it

Thats where the NAP comes into play

in order to enforce anything, you have to have laws and law enforcement

i guess they believe in some kind of community enforcement?

i wouldnt be so confused if they were more open to talk to people about it

they won't talk about it because the logic just doesn't pan out

in order for anarchy to exist, anarchy must not exist

anarchy just means against archy, it doesnt mean no rules

ancaps believe in private law and private enforcement of property rights

but i dunno what ancoms believe in

It doesnt mean against archy, it means without archy (or ruleRs in english)

Like i am.

whats the significant difference though?