Message from @Atkins
Discord ID: 497883947552997376
HAHHAHAHHAHA
😄
🍻
Have some rape juice.
I wouldn't even rape you.
🚩
i had nealko beer earlier today.. am I rapist nao ? ;_;
look at all that bi partisan voting
@.B that argument is like
1. My car has a flat tire
2. car no work whatdo
3. set car on fire
4. hope to find new car for reasonable price
That's silly. You're not a rapist simply for drinking beer.
Did you throw any ice cubes?
@Ottobon that example is shit. You cant have lefty shit on bad economy. The reasoning is that people would have to look after themselves instead of being dependent on the state
Which it achieves, through chaos
Burning your car has no positive
I would even argue that reducing the amount of cars in the market would ensure the next car would be more expensive
That makes sense
Don't be too serious on it though. It was just an interesting idea to be entertained
ya and what im saying is letting the left crash the economy to push libertarian ideas is the same as burning the car. your working under the presumption a economic crash would make people who fought for overtly left policies would wise up after the fact, they wouldn't even if it brought them to shambles. Alot of people in venezuela are still like 'owo hugo daddy why'd you have to go ;-;"
They for sure aren't getting fed by the state 😏
But there is also no end in sight to the regime.
People aren't overthrowing him, they're just fleeing the country for less socialist states.
I think that's one of the biggest flaws of logic many people commit:
Just because a system fails does not mean that people realize the reason.
Accelerationism is just:
Step 1: Communism
Step 2: ????
Step 3: Libertarian Utopia
It might help people to exercise some introspection, but if that's ever to be the case, they would have incentive long before the final crash to do so.
This sounds incredibly harsh, but some people are simply stupid.
I'll never be Terrence Tao.
Countries that experienced communism are terrified of it for generations
Yes, and some countries are right back to socialism.
You sort out why.
^
In the case of the Soviet Union, there was an ideological war long before that.
So, when the Soviet Union crashed, people had a very clear example of what worked and what doesn't.
There were examples around how to do things better. Now, that everybody seems to go towards socialist policies, there is less of an example around how to do it better.
Back when the Soviet Union fell, everybody was looking to America as the glowing example of success, so I think it became more obvious what particular faults were responsible.
Acceleration is an incredibly dumb idea.