not someone that faps into cp content once 🤔
getting aroused by something, doesn't determine your tastes
let's change the example though, because cp is unconfortable to debate
let's say gay porn
just because someone young tries to look and explore gay porn
that doesn't necessarily make them gay
right. genuine curiosity
if you think otherwise, the definition you apply would become useless
because everyone would be labeled gay
"I got aroused multiple times by gay porn" there, he's gay
doesn't work that way
if they get aroused by it, they're gay
(or bi)
@ZlaX we determined that after all, you are gay
😂
ur mom gay lol
<:GWfroggySadCat:400751069619159050>
meanies
if you ever got aroused by something with a dick, ever. @Crow labels you gay
<:beanie:463084349642899468>
but what if its a fem pp <:GWfroggySadCat:400751069619159050>
I now understand how the left got trigger happy with labels. It's because people like Crow that apply them as loosely as he wants
something can have multiple subjects, you could be attracted to the wall *or* the paint, or both. Likewise you could be attracted to the "feminine penis" which is gay, or the boobs which isn't
but what if she is a futa 🤔
G A Y
if it's a futa, and you go out of your way to watch futa porn, chances are you get off on the dick
@ZlaX don't worry. By his standards, fapping to loli hentai is pedo too
<:GWfroggyBlobSweat:398569211242479627>
aren't the left super specific and narrow with their labels though? and apply them as tightly and rigidly and... "autistically" as posible?
for example how many genders are there?
nah
racist, nazi, etc
ask a sane person and he'll say 2, men and women covers everybody
are you pro-wall? Xenophobe
did you just criticise a jew? Anti-semitic
ask a leftie, and you get 1000000000000 genders
did that girl have a dick and you had a stiffy? Gay
that's not applying a label broadly, that's assuming intent
