Message from @.B

Discord ID: 518758957129531411


2018-12-02 11:56:31 UTC  

let's go by parts. First, our first examples were just about watching, not fapping, erection, or stiffy

2018-12-02 11:56:43 UTC  

I think the wider labels are the better, we don't really need 10000000 genders, two or at most three should suffice

2018-12-02 11:56:59 UTC  

you can never judge someone merely because they _watched_ something

2018-12-02 11:57:29 UTC  

>our first examples were just about watching, not fapping, erection, or stiffy
Your example was, and I quote
>if I fap to paint dry on a wall, that doesn't mean I'm aroused by walls

2018-12-02 11:57:41 UTC  

don't conflate two different examples

2018-12-02 11:57:42 UTC  

that wasn't even the first mate

2018-12-02 11:57:47 UTC  

that was the middle of it

2018-12-02 11:58:37 UTC  

>First, our first examples were just about watching, not fapping, erection, or stiffy
Right then. and as I said, there are many reasons you could watch something. By accident. As part of your legal investigation. Out of morbid curiosity.

2018-12-02 11:58:49 UTC  

>cp is banned everywhere, but I wouldn't claim that anyone that watches it is a pedo

2018-12-02 11:59:13 UTC  

I have never contested that

2018-12-02 11:59:44 UTC  

but anyone who is aroused by the prepubescent children in the CP is a pedo

2018-12-02 12:00:26 UTC  

depends how vague you are with definitions

2018-12-02 12:00:40 UTC  

a pedo is someone that is into kids

2018-12-02 12:00:58 UTC  

not someone that faps into cp content once 🤔

2018-12-02 12:01:27 UTC  

getting aroused by something, doesn't determine your tastes

2018-12-02 12:01:44 UTC  

let's change the example though, because cp is unconfortable to debate

2018-12-02 12:01:55 UTC  

let's say gay porn

2018-12-02 12:02:26 UTC  

just because someone young tries to look and explore gay porn

2018-12-02 12:02:31 UTC  

that doesn't necessarily make them gay

2018-12-02 12:02:47 UTC  

right. genuine curiosity

2018-12-02 12:02:53 UTC  

if you think otherwise, the definition you apply would become useless

2018-12-02 12:03:05 UTC  

because everyone would be labeled gay

2018-12-02 12:03:22 UTC  

"I got aroused multiple times by gay porn" there, he's gay

2018-12-02 12:03:31 UTC  

doesn't work that way

2018-12-02 12:03:50 UTC  

if they get aroused by it, they're gay

2018-12-02 12:03:56 UTC  

(or bi)

2018-12-02 12:04:47 UTC  

@ZlaX we determined that after all, you are gay

2018-12-02 12:04:56 UTC  

😂

2018-12-02 12:05:15 UTC  

ur mom gay lol

2018-12-02 12:05:25 UTC  

<:GWfroggySadCat:400751069619159050>

2018-12-02 12:05:30 UTC  

meanies

2018-12-02 12:05:49 UTC  

if you ever got aroused by something with a dick, ever. @Crow labels you gay

2018-12-02 12:06:26 UTC  

<:GWfroggySadCat:400751069619159050>

<:beanie:463084349642899468>

2018-12-02 12:06:49 UTC  

but what if its a fem pp <:GWfroggySadCat:400751069619159050>

2018-12-02 12:06:54 UTC  

I now understand how the left got trigger happy with labels. It's because people like Crow that apply them as loosely as he wants

2018-12-02 12:06:56 UTC  

something can have multiple subjects, you could be attracted to the wall *or* the paint, or both. Likewise you could be attracted to the "feminine penis" which is gay, or the boobs which isn't

<:beanie:463084349642899468>

2018-12-02 12:07:39 UTC  

but what if she is a futa 🤔

2018-12-02 12:07:58 UTC  

G A Y

2018-12-02 12:08:05 UTC  

if it's a futa, and you go out of your way to watch futa porn, chances are you get off on the dick