fug
you were the one that used a strawman so stupid that it had to be debunked
why can you only make your argument using children tho?
we were talking about young teens and you decided to discuss **5 year old kids**
and what have you actually debunked? all you've done is opinionate which is fine
no we weren't
you stopped talkign about homosexuals and brought up **underage**
which is a strictly legal term
can be 12, can be 20, can be 17
feel free to quote me on any example I used or mentioned anyone younger than 12
>you were the one picking an age that was convinient for you. Because your same argument doesn't work if the girl is 12
I'll quote yours first http://puu.sh/Cba8q.png
oh so 12 is fine by you, but not younger?
loli hentai is not cp
yep, and violent videogames is not violence. It's still simulated violence and simulated CP
>simulated CP 😂
Was this not you bringing up underage girls despite claiming you wanted to switch to homo?
you asked for an example mate
firey underwear
http://puu.sh/Cbad9.png
>show me where
nice job quote mining
are you new to this?
how the fuck is that quote mining?
you literally went back to discussing children again
because YOU asked to
you asked for a point where you assumed intent
I only pointed to an example again
it's not even a relevant answer, intent is irrelevant there
that IS a relevant answer. Because YOU think it's pedo if you do find the girl is underage. I do not
I have never once brought up the legal definition "underage" as part of my argument
that's a strawman on your side
The guy fapping to it had no idea she was underage, and is in no way pedo
yet you assume intent
I don't assume intent, because I don't make that argument. it's a strawman you're trying to push
well.. you were the one that brought hebephilia as an argument
not me
yeah, THAT is an argument I've made, and pedophilia, never have I made an argument using "underage"
that's all a strawman
no it isn't, I gave the example where the girl was 12
12 years old doesn't go under hebephilia
