it **generally** gets you that label, depending on if the **specific** 12 year old child you get aroused by is prepubescent or not

go back to talking about traps

http://puu.sh/Cb9Dg.jpg

😏

I don't understand why Belial keeps going back to discussing children either

lol

Is that an admission of guilt?

any label you want to give me because of that?

he even pretended to feel uncomfortable and switched to discussing homo instead, but less than five minutes later he switched back to discussing children

crow gay

u gay

mirror

fug

you were the one that used a strawman so stupid that it had to be debunked

why can you only make your argument using children tho?

we were talking about young teens and you decided to discuss **5 year old kids**

and what have you actually debunked? all you've done is opinionate which is fine

no we weren't

you stopped talkign about homosexuals and brought up **underage**

which is a strictly legal term

can be 12, can be 20, can be 17

feel free to quote me on any example I used or mentioned anyone younger than 12

>you were the one picking an age that was convinient for you. Because your same argument doesn't work if the girl is 12

I'll quote yours first
http://puu.sh/Cba8q.png

oh so 12 is fine by you, but not younger?

loli hentai is not cp

yep, and violent videogames is not violence. It's still simulated violence and simulated CP

>simulated CP
😂

Was this not you bringing up underage girls despite claiming you wanted to switch to homo?

you asked for an example mate

firey underwear

http://puu.sh/Cbad9.png

>show me where

nice job quote mining

are you new to this?

how the fuck is that quote mining?

you literally went back to discussing children again

because YOU asked to

you asked for a point where you assumed intent

I only pointed to an example again

it's not even a relevant answer, intent is irrelevant there