Message from @McFansy
Discord ID: 685777057954791457
this will attract skinheads
you will get snowballing bad optics
Napoleon poses on those of royal birth.
thats not a fair comparison, you know that was drawn mostly from imagination
and he achieved shit before this was drawn, no?
Napoleon making it up as he goes along.
so he became a Royal to own the royals
well you have to admit he was better than them.
anyone have the coronation painting?
Than the Bourbons? sure
we live in a time where what I posted is bad optics, thats all im saying
dabs on the Pope
I'm on a bit of a napoleon kick
@Fighting Gold depends on the country and the audience. I wouldn't show that to my grandmother.
Napoleon is a bit underrated in reactionary circles because of all the republics he made way for
Chad
I'd choose a non retarded Royal over a middle nobleman larping as one
@Imperial J. Yay why? He was objectively much better.
Than the Bourbons
and he was barely a noble
there were no skinheads in napoleons time, and attracting people like that wouldnt have been as bad optics as it is today because of the ease of information exchange
Also feds
Skinheads of Napoleons time would have unironically been the Jacobins
@Fighting Gold There were chad Muscadins dealing with the lower class sans-culottes
You would beat these people with canes if you had the chance
@RIP Skelly The Beggars of Naples where Reactionary because the King was friendly to them. They where the only ones loyal to that monarchy where the bourgeoisie and nobles wanted liberal republicanism: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazzaroni_(Naples)
nice
🤮 😬 🔫
Specifically blonde women?
Why not Jewish women?
because sweden is full of swedes, not jews
and yews are kind of based, they make us cucks but they are not (usually)
>competitive sex
competing with your bro to father the biggest dynasty