Message from @DrocsidInReverse
Discord ID: 697301453060177971
Yes.
But do you have an argument to accompany that opinion?
lol do you know where you are
he's criticizing us
Sounds more like he's criticizing you. I'm one if the libertarians you invited over to enrich your gene pool
>unironic libertarians
<:PeepoWeird:684862716430647319>
being libertarian in year of our lord 2020 A.D. 😂
Vermuele: `I want to suggest a principle of immigration priority that should, I hope, be broadly acceptable or at least intriguing for all right-thinking persons concerned that current American immigration policy is racist and classist, explicitly or implicitly, de jure or de facto. The principle is to give lexical priority to confirmed Catholics, all of whom will jump immediately to the head of the queue. Yes, some will convert in order to gain admission; this is a feature, not a bug.
This principle will disproportionately favor immigrants from Africa, Asia, and Latin America. (Note here that the priority is for actual Catholics, not for applicants from “historically Catholic countries”; relatively few Western Europeans will pass through the eye of the needle, and the Irish will be almost totally excluded). It will disproportionately favor the poor, and will draw no distinction between those seeking asylum based on a fear of persecution, and those fleeing “mere” economic hardship. It will in effect require opening the southern border of the United States, although immigration from Canada will rightly become a rare and difficult event, at least if we do not count a small subset of Quebecois.`
lol peak internet Catholicism
imagine unironically wanting to be ruled by bergoglio the communist
<:pepejoy:611733498499432472>
personally, I think that immigration should be limited to based nationalist white Buddhists
this idea **should**, I am certain, be broadly acceptable or at least intriguing for all right-thinking persons.
> Vermuele: `I want to suggest a principle of immigration priority that should, I hope, be broadly acceptable or at least intriguing for all right-thinking persons concerned that current American immigration policy is racist and classist, explicitly or implicitly, de jure or de facto. The principle is to give lexical priority to confirmed Catholics, all of whom will jump immediately to the head of the queue. Yes, some will convert in order to gain admission; this is a feature, not a bug.
>
> This principle will disproportionately favor immigrants from Africa, Asia, and Latin America. (Note here that the priority is for actual Catholics, not for applicants from “historically Catholic countries”; relatively few Western Europeans will pass through the eye of the needle, and the Irish will be almost totally excluded). It will disproportionately favor the poor, and will draw no distinction between those seeking asylum based on a fear of persecution, and those fleeing “mere” economic hardship. It will in effect require opening the southern border of the United States, although immigration from Canada will rightly become a rare and difficult event, at least if we do not count a small subset of Quebecois.`
@rock on, Ānanda Ugggghhhh
This is why my WigNat friends make fun of me.
This is the Catholic version of those "I love pot and porn" articles that dominate libertarian outlets.
I think it really is the same disorder causing it; pathological need to allay the concerns of your left-wing friends. We can only hope that the next generation of right-wingers will not contract it.
Papists
Blah
Catholics are a fith colum in the US
If that's the passage you take offense at, then I get you. Especially with these reasons. Last time, I think I skipped too much of the first paragraph, the parts where he talks of racism and classicism etc.
Immigration should be invitation-only, and the one who did the inviting (my english fails me at the moment) should be held liable for damages caused. Under a hoppean system, that should work very well.
```This is the Catholic version of those "I love pot and porn" articles that dominate libertarian outlets.```
Don't remind me of this crap. Libertarians ought to argue from the highest expressions of freedom, the freedom of conscience first of all, down to the lower forms, not vice versa, which is what they have often done.
Bernie Bros on eternal suicide watch
<:pepe_down:662852278830628923>
one thing that's nice about the chinavirus is that it's revealed just how worthless 90% of news cycles are
like
have you heard anything about this garbage over Trump firing the Obama IGs
that would have been front-page news in normal times
and literally who fucking cares
also all the 2020 primary shit
From now on we call this the chinavirus
bernibros on suicide watch, yet again
Why is it called chapo trap house what is it?