Message from @Despot Romanicus the Enslaver
Discord ID: 697643998545969182
From now on we call this the chinavirus
bernibros on suicide watch, yet again
Why is it called chapo trap house what is it?
some podcast, never heard of it
it's the bernibros everyone points to when he fails
Oh
why is it called Chapo Trap House? They could have just called it "Ironic Nonsense Podcast", but maybe that would be a little too on the nose.
Drug reference = funi
now do women
Spiteful mutants are parasites therefore they don’t have rights
no one has rights
YES
Look at me
***I am the Parasite Now***
~
Well Intentioned Reactionary: "I want to make a prosperous and productive society."
*Accidently Invents Consumerism*
>no one has rights
Why? @Skellington
You have rights to that which you can defend
You can talk about natural law and such but de facto human might not human right prevail
That is already presupposing that rights don't exist, and that in fact no moral law of any kind is real.
certainly the modern idea of rights is fake and gay because "human rights" is basically just a stand in for liberal values
I think this idea comes from stretching the analogy of natural and positive law too far. They are alike in that they both prescribe or prohibit certain courses of conduct, but different in that the former is either enacted by God or stems from the nature of things (or both, that would be my position). We can say that a right under the positive law ceases to exist when it is enforced, but the reason for that is that when the state gives you a right and then consistently infringes against it, it enters a performative contradiction, and thus the right can be said not to exist. With the natural law, this same argument doesn't work.
Although it might also come from the is-ought-fallacy(-fallacy), but I doubt people here subscribe to Humes idea, as it vitiates all moral discourse.
Ok. I believe in natural law and Gods commandments. But those laws won't be enacted in reality without the power and will to enact it
You can talk about property rights and homesteading but in America the white settler's took the land for themselves. Of course you could argue that the Indians didn't do much productive with the land but still. The point is that all those tribes are dead now and amerimdian culture is dead.
Well shit
Hello fellow reactioniggers
I'm new
They could not defend their claims
Hey @Skellington
The problem about rights is that people need to understand they need a power structure to enforce them and that if you have rights you must also have a duty
@AH-64 The issue with rights is that no one can give an intellectually honest account of what they are without delving into circular or emotive reasoning.
Even the appeal to Divine Law is dishonest. Rights tend to be treated as a declarative fact, whereas Divine Law is, by its nature, an imperative.
But furthermore: what is a right? What is its concise definition? What makes it different from a privilege?