Papists

Blah

Catholics are a fith colum in the US

If that's the passage you take offense at, then I get you. Especially with these reasons. Last time, I think I skipped too much of the first paragraph, the parts where he talks of racism and classicism etc.

Immigration should be invitation-only, and the one who did the inviting (my english fails me at the moment) should be held liable for damages caused. Under a hoppean system, that should work very well.

```This is the Catholic version of those "I love pot and porn" articles that dominate libertarian outlets.```
Don't remind me of this crap. Libertarians ought to argue from the highest expressions of freedom, the freedom of conscience first of all, down to the lower forms, not vice versa, which is what they have often done.

Bernie Bros on eternal suicide watch

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sanders-suspends-presidential-campaign

<:pepe_down:662852278830628923>

one thing that's nice about the chinavirus is that it's revealed just how worthless 90% of news cycles are

like

have you heard anything about this garbage over Trump firing the Obama IGs

that would have been front-page news in normal times

and literally who fucking cares

also all the 2020 primary shit

From now on we call this the chinavirus

https://www.reddit.com/r/ChapoTrapHouse/

bernibros on suicide watch, yet again

Why is it called chapo trap house what is it?

@JCDenton

some podcast, never heard of it

it's the bernibros everyone points to when he fails

Oh

why is it called Chapo Trap House? They could have just called it "Ironic Nonsense Podcast", but maybe that would be a little too on the nose.

Drug reference = funi

now do women

@RIP Skelly

Spiteful mutants are parasites therefore they don’t have rights

no one has rights

YES

Look at me

***I am the Parasite Now***

~
Well Intentioned Reactionary: "I want to make a prosperous and productive society."

*Accidently Invents Consumerism*

https://youtu.be/00xuN8Tbnig

>no one has rights
Why? @Skellington

You have rights to that which you can defend

You can talk about natural law and such but de facto human might not human right prevail

That is already presupposing that rights don't exist, and that in fact no moral law of any kind is real.

certainly the modern idea of rights is fake and gay because "human rights" is basically just a stand in for liberal values