Message from @Old1812
Discord ID: 685464827857993749
It's not that expensive to make nitrogen using the Haber Bosch technique since after the war it replaced Guano across the world
And became the source for Nitrogen in fertilizer etc.
yes because it was made cheaper by then.
Germany's economy wasn't going to be its end. Not after gaining that many trade partners in the east
They would continue printing bonds and whatnot
Only major issue I see is that abandoning the Rhineland would seriously fuck up war production
A lot of ore and coal deposits there
And industry, though that could be relocated in part
Though abandoning the Rhineland would not be without an economic upside since it's very urban and feeding it would then be an issue for the Entente, not Germany
as if entete would even give them anything beyon starvation rations lol
I somehow doubt Americans and Brits would be fine with that
Don't replace Falkenhayn. H&L gutted the German economy, announced unrestricted submarine warfare, and launced the Spring Offensive
Yet no one ever talks about Falkenhayn
anyways to conclude Austro hungary was on verge of collapse by 1918.after thy implode entete would launch a lightning invasion of austria and then push into german lowlands from there
so no not even the rhine defence would save germany 8n this scenario
That's ignoring the reasons for Austria Hungaries "collapse"
First of all food shortages which would be adressed through eastern gains and the loss of the Rhineland
Beat Italy on the Piave, take Venice, and knock them out of the war. That helps you right there
Secondly military pressure from the Entente in Greece and Romania
Which can be handled if Germany sent more men freed up through a better defensive line in the west and no spring offensive
I don't know if they could manage to outright defeat Greece but they could stabilize the front since the Balkans are one huge ass series of easily defendable terrain
Beating Italy would be hard to do because of the mountainous terrain of the Alps
Then taking Venice might not make them capitulate, at least I don't think so
And Venice and its surroundings are much harder to dfened because tanks could be effectively deployed by the Entente
Unless the central powers at that point build some tanks too giving them more of an offensive capability
But I wouldn't know by when they would be able to have tanks or if they even would make any if they give up the Rhineland
I mostly think that the war could be "won" by staying on the defense and making it supremely painfull manpower wise to advance further on the central powers
After which you would have to gradually get Entente members to drop out with token concessions
The real question would be when the first major participant after America drops out the war
I think Italy and France are too belligerent to give up easily, Italy because of the sunk cost fallacy, France because it would hold the Rhineland
So I think the first one after America to go simply because of war weariness would be Britain through a negotiated peace
Say they get Germany's colonies or whatever and something from the Ottomans
If Britain is out so is Belgium imo
Japan would also drop out easily for German colonies in the Pacific and Tsingtau
Leaving only France and Italy as major participants
this chat
bottom text
Anybody here has some good books/articles about ancient Greeks and their culture? Particularly something that provides counter argument for their homo-society narrative.
I need an antidote for a fa8 of a "professor" of mine.