Message from @WanderingRusski
Discord ID: 688800037412929587
Unless it's Jin Roh
@vexmasina44 I am sorry but we do not allow Chinese cartoons here!
well shiet
im having deja vu here
i remember talking about this exact comment chain like 2 or more months ago
but this comment is 6 days old
needs major updating
@vexmasina44 dude you have <#668910806598942730>. Use it.
i already do
reeeeeeee
@Skellington Is President Sunday in this server? If so, what is his ID. I will ban him.
@Endeavour no he is in argents
idk what to think of him
the rumors of him doxxing or doing gay ops are mostly false from what i know
his videos are a mixed bag
The Thing about Birthrates mentioned earlier, It also depends on a Families Religious and Political Points of View. Mormons in the United States have a 3.0 birthrate. Conservative Christians who go to church have like a 2.4 Birthrate and while standard of living effects it, the very religious Amish who stay in pre industrial times have like a 6.0 birthrate lol. But just because we have a high standard of living society doesn't mean we automatically go sub replacement having a economic system and government benefits that prioritizes family formation and with the population being religious and conservative we can maintain a above replacement fertility.
@Skellington Isnβt he left wing?
no i think he's center right
I don't like him because it's so unclear what his position is
He has this brain dead political theory angle where everything is like a textbook, and if something's not up to his university level of wank it's meaningless.
@HyperGrapes What do you expect for someone into political science?
I guess, but he could at least try to consider, like, the real world. Pol Sci turns to shit when it gets in the way of understanding actual politics. I like my ideas written like Chesterton's, his stuff is the opposite of that
Lol the absolute state of the US census
lebanese, egyptian etc
they trying to find ways to make it appear like there's more whites than there really is
if they mark more than one box how do they count it?
Hispanic status is also a different question from race/ethnicity
So somebody can mark Hispanic and THEN another race
(White, black, etc)
confusing
Which is technically correct and the rigorous way to do it anthropologically
But normies donβt know any of this
So really it just ends up as a miscount
they never going to count all the mexicans anyways
there too many