Message from @Norik
Discord ID: 698687637883715656
yes but it's somebody who cares about you
giving you a substantial amount
once
knowing you'd do the right thing with it
Does the person giving it really matter when the point of contention is the plausibility of results?
I sure as shit wouldn't feel comfortable giving my tax money to some druggie in nowhereville KY
The point you asked for was does it ever work? It does work, does it always work? No. Probably fails more than works.
But it can work.
I don't think your example is even remotely relevant to a discussion of government-enforced dysgenic redistribution
It was only relevant to the question you asked.
<:PeepoWeird:684862716430647319>
I don't think you understood my question then
🧑
I was asking if there was ever an example of mass redistribution of wealth by the government uplifting an underclass out of poverty
(there isn't)
Oooooh, so you were asking about uplifting an entire class of people.
Well seeing how communism has never been successful. No
what the fuck else would be the point of giving an entire class of people money
if it's not to help the entire class of people
Why would you do that?
> I am of the mind though, that the amount of money we put into trying to up lift inner cities would have a drastically different and more successful result if we put it into the appalachians or the midwest.
Did I? I thought I was talking about a geographic poverty, not class poverty.
Uplifting geographic poverty seems far more feasible than class poverty.
what does that even mean
Putting wealth into an area decreases poverty, but maintains class structure.
yes but what does that look like practically
Id say the difference between countries, states, counties, and cities. When it comes to examples of it in play. Trade, tariffs, geopolitical wars and alliances. Taxes, public works, subsidized buisnesses, market manipulation/regulation, etc.
In a way, cities leach wealth out of the rural parts of the country. Based resources are harvested in the boonies, manufacture in manufacturing towns and traded in metropolitan mega cities.
What are we talking about?
Their favorite parts of siege
Idk, the movie 3 signs in Missouri
idk this conversation is meandering aimlessly based on that shitty movie about le dumb hicks
I fucking hate hollywood
Yeah. Still a good movie.
But it is pretty anti white.
Understanable, But honestly if you hate the movie don't critque it or bring attention towards it......
Hollywood is anti white propoganda
I trust the people on this server not to fall for Hollywood tricks.
well my point was that even the so-called good points lima is bringing up about the movie are still dumb
the entire thing is pozzed and elitist in a distinctly post-modern urbanite way