> @Mr.Fisch（炫龙） based? on what?
@Yak
Based on axiomatic truths

It's impossible in the long run

Whoah really got me there retard

> You can't have a market and anarchism at the same time
@Iron Nation
How come?

Because market success just hedges out the weak into permanent slavery

and makes them sell their organs

or their kids or w/e

So you just establish a de facto hierarchy even if de jure there isn't one

> It's impossible in the long run
@Iron Nation
Socialism is impossible, capitalism is axiomatic. Denying that is denying human nature

“Keynes was a libertine hedonist who wasted most of his adult life engaging in sexual relationships with children, including travelling around the Mediterranean visiting children’s brothels. [This is verified by references in his letters. See footnotes] …Keynes was part of a generation that rose against Victorian traditions and regarded them as a repressive institution to be brought down. It is impossible to understand the economics of Keynes without understanding the kind of morality he wanted to see in a society he increasingly believed he could shape according to his own will.” Saifedean Ammous The Bitcoin Standard p.95
Peak Kaynes 😂

> and makes them sell their organs
@Iron Nation
Physical removal

I'm a nationalist socialist so I advocate lean socialism or basically socialism for people I like and the rest can just die

Another commie

Not really

@DarkEagle553👌😂👌

So tell me how you plan to abolish governments

Imagine not crushing your enemies with state power

> I'm a nationalist socialist so I advocate lean socialism or basically socialism for people I like and the rest can just die
@Iron Nation
Socialism is bullshit... nationalism? Can live with that

Ok gay

Families are socialist

I don't charge my kids to feed them breakfast

> Families are socialist
@Iron Nation
Hahaha

The child not consenting is socialism

Families are capitalism, everything above is socialism

How is a family capitalist?

what

That sounds beyond retarded

How can you apply an economic term to a family?

Rothbard ended up saying children were the property of their parents until adults

> The child not consenting is socialism
@EYEFORKNOWLEDGE156
The child consenting is absence of moral family values

Which I don't need to say, is retarded

this is still going on, you will waste minutes of your life you will never get back from talking to the roach faggot

And these people take the words of these people without a single grain of salt

>families are capitalists

>talks with authority about human nature

physical lolbert removal

I'm sorry you have to pay your kids to love you lmao but that's an uncommon experience

> How can you apply an economic term to a family?
@EYEFORKNOWLEDGE156
Because families are the natural social security network

I'm just letting you know

And are division of labour

social security

you mean