@Mr.Fisch（炫龙） imagine thinking the economic theory is a gospel and there only one true way.

Corporatism literally is a third position regarding capitalism and socialism

You have to be willfully ignorant to keep on saying it's not

> @Mr.Fisch（炫龙） imagine thinking the economic theory is a gospel and there only one true way.
@Korin Dickman
That's the point of axiomatic truths

Corporatism rejects class conflict and embraces class collaboration for the common good of the nation.

Corporatism is an even bigger cancer than capitalism and gommunism lol

Not that kind of corporatism vex

Not corporate welfare oligarchy type

Fascist corporatism is nothing like Ancap corporatism.

Which lolberts often call the current model

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism

What is your definition of socialism, if I may ask?

When the workers own the means of production

Socialism is the nationalization of all or almost all of the official economy

The shadow economy exists of course

@Mr.Fisch（炫龙） if you think the way you conduct your business and manage the country economy is axiomatic truth you have to be out of your bloody mind.

Put under a one party state

Socialism is kinda based since people like Mr. Fish will be sent to gulag
so he doesent annoy the rest of society

Socialism, as Marx defined it, as a position between the overthrow of capitalism and communism. It was a position where the workers owned the means of production and where all of the economy was nationalized.

> When the workers own the means of production
@Skeleton
Yes, that's the Marxist socialist version.

> Socialism is the nationalization of all or almost all of the official economy
@Mr. Nessel
Yes, that's the statist version

Mr.Fisch would be in a Gulag under most systems probably

xD

> The shadow economy exists of course
@Mr. Nessel
Yes, because the logic of himan action is axiomatic

No it's the normal version

German Workers Party, Aussig, Bohemia, 1903

> Mr.Fisch would be in a Gulag under most systems probably
@Mr. Nessel
Yes

Finally. Found it

Don't assume your lolbert worldview is the standard of all things

You don't get to redefine things

Prussian socialism is different from Marxian socialism.

LoL, Socialism is collective ownership of the means of production. That's even the normie definition.

I think he actually denied the natsocs were Prussian socialists though

@Mr.Fisch（炫龙） Because it's the consensus

You all have the same notion with different nuances

Yes

That's also my definition

The actual normie definition is Norway is socialism

Which lolberts agree with actually