Pseudo-Pilled introduced me to The Decentralized Left on his server @EYEFORKNOWLEDGE156

Cool

can we have a new rule to ban anything jreg related

I support this endeavor

@Skellington I agree. Anything Jreg related is hereby banned.

I support this Endeavour ^

@Narmer you heard the boss

Noted

based monarch

@Kermit

Based endeavour

lmao based monarch dabbing on rebels

#3 I would say applies only to our brothers and sisters in Christ

Pagans/Atheists BTFO

Then you might as well not be against infighting in general

Says the heathen

I'd rather not have infighting in general. It's not productive.

There are more pressing matters at hand.

Like fighting heathens

Bruh

I somehow doubt that a movement consisting solely of radical christians who want to remove nonbelievers from society is going to go that far

Call me crazy

You forgot iconoclasm.

Best thing is to just stay as a cohesive unit and have the line of "religion is good for society but let's not get into details"

Even atheists can agree to it

Open question, but would like to hear from @Endeavour and @Charlemagne in particular: would you rather live in a Machiavellian principality or in a Hobbesian commonwealth?

Why?

Instinctually I suppose Machiavellian since it would likely be more of a formalist systems.

Huh

What do you mean

Oh wait Hobbes is an absolutist isn't he?

Isn't a Hobbesian Commonwealth a republic

I would probably prefer the Machiavellian system as it would probably be more decentralized similar to patchwork

Lol no Hobbes’ commonwealth is all the power concentrated in a single absolute monarch

Whose authority is derived from the consent of the governed

I think the consent of the governed is kind of bullshit

(It’s not actually that simple but that’s the gist)

Commonwealth is literally the translation of republic though

And afaik Hobbes was ambivalent about monarchy/republic

Yes but that’s not how he uses it

Arguing against rebellion