Message from @Skellington
Discord ID: 693273703374520320
4. Art: we don’t really have that much of an artistic circle and we need that to bring out our ideas this can be music, movies, paintings/drawings etc. Art can be used to draw in a larger audience that might be susceptible to our ideas
5. Vetting: this one is much harder to set up and is more vague or harder to describe but we need a way to vet people that is coming into our movement too many times has this happened that people of poor character comes in gets traction and turns out that they have serious flaws (thinking about heimbach) that at the very least makes us look bad and at worse can lead to the demise of a movement especially if it’s a central figure
Just a couple points that came to me just now there are more but these I just thought of off the top of my head
Pseudo-Pilled introduced me to The Decentralized Left on his server @EYEFORKNOWLEDGE156
Cool
can we have a new rule to ban anything jreg related
I support this endeavor
@Skellington I agree. Anything Jreg related is hereby banned.
I support this Endeavour ^
@Narmer you heard the boss
Noted
based monarch
Based endeavour
lmao based monarch dabbing on rebels
#3 I would say applies only to our brothers and sisters in Christ
Pagans/Atheists BTFO
Then you might as well not be against infighting in general
Says the heathen
I'd rather not have infighting in general. It's not productive.
There are more pressing matters at hand.
Bruh
I somehow doubt that a movement consisting solely of radical christians who want to remove nonbelievers from society is going to go that far
Call me crazy
You forgot iconoclasm.
Best thing is to just stay as a cohesive unit and have the line of "religion is good for society but let's not get into details"
Even atheists can agree to it
Open question, but would like to hear from @Endeavour and @Charlemagne in particular: would you rather live in a Machiavellian principality or in a Hobbesian commonwealth?
Why?
Instinctually I suppose Machiavellian since it would likely be more of a formalist systems.
Huh
What do you mean
Oh wait Hobbes is an absolutist isn't he?
Isn't a Hobbesian Commonwealth a republic
I would probably prefer the Machiavellian system as it would probably be more decentralized similar to patchwork
Lol no Hobbes’ commonwealth is all the power concentrated in a single absolute monarch
Whose authority is derived from the consent of the governed
I think the consent of the governed is kind of bullshit
(It’s not actually that simple but that’s the gist)
Commonwealth is literally the translation of republic though
And afaik Hobbes was ambivalent about monarchy/republic