Message from @Lucian

Discord ID: 465770183131136001


2018-07-09 06:37:36 UTC  

just one example

2018-07-09 06:37:55 UTC  

Gross misrepresentation

2018-07-09 06:38:12 UTC  

another example is consequences of assault.... police are allowed to threaten assualt on non-violent ppl who pose no threat just for the sake of compliance

2018-07-09 06:38:28 UTC  

gross misrepresentation? how so? am i wrong?

2018-07-09 06:39:10 UTC  

You can be correct on facts, and incorrect in how you portray the situation at the same time.

2018-07-09 06:39:10 UTC  

seems like youre very triggered .... its okay.... relax man... lol

2018-07-09 06:39:41 UTC  

Projecting, much?

2018-07-09 06:40:00 UTC  

Not sure whether this analogy works, but the consequences of assault reminds me of the privilege that tenured professors have on their work/speeches

2018-07-09 06:41:15 UTC  

you touch a police in a unwanted or welcoming way, they can body slam you, arrest you, and throw you in a cage.... but they can do the same to you for NO GOOD reason against ppl non-violent who pose no danger or threat merely for the sake of forced compliance

2018-07-09 06:42:13 UTC  

So an argument in favor of chaos then.

2018-07-09 06:42:22 UTC  

Let me address that.

2018-07-09 06:42:35 UTC  

Duty to enforce open carry

2018-07-09 06:42:41 UTC  

Yes. That is the law that was voted upon in California

2018-07-09 06:43:01 UTC  

It's the law that the people of California choose to live under. The police will enforce it.

2018-07-09 06:43:06 UTC  

you are actually misunderstanding me though.... i dont have a problem with them going after actual violent criminals

2018-07-09 06:43:25 UTC  

But open carrying despite the fact that agreed-upon law says no?

2018-07-09 06:43:42 UTC  

a *minority* of ppl who voted to impose their will over a majority of ppl

2018-07-09 06:43:59 UTC  

majority of ppl dont even vote

2018-07-09 06:44:09 UTC  

Not voting is a choice

2018-07-09 06:44:09 UTC  

So you're speaking out against a representative government, too.

2018-07-09 06:44:25 UTC  

Then whose fault is it for not participating in voting?

2018-07-09 06:44:33 UTC  

```if you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice!``` - Rush

2018-07-09 06:44:53 UTC  

but the whole idea is CONSENT of the governed

2018-07-09 06:45:20 UTC  

Apathy is consent technically

2018-07-09 06:45:26 UTC  

thats a weak argument because some ppl just magically give themselves the right to impose their will over others

2018-07-09 06:45:27 UTC  

I mean....

2018-07-09 06:45:34 UTC  

doesnt make it legitimate

2018-07-09 06:45:56 UTC  

Oh, what's that concept that goes around in SJW circles?

2018-07-09 06:46:05 UTC  

Where you have to ask consent every 15 seconds or some shit

2018-07-09 06:46:18 UTC  

Basically that, but in government form?

2018-07-09 06:46:19 UTC  

LOL thats retarded, dude... come on... .talk about misrepresentation

2018-07-09 06:46:49 UTC  

Consent is implied until stated otherwise

2018-07-09 06:46:53 UTC  

California checks the consent of the people every year in november.

2018-07-09 06:46:59 UTC  

We do?

2018-07-09 06:47:11 UTC  

@missdanger BINGO okay okayl... lets see here ...

2018-07-09 06:47:15 UTC  

okay everyone .... listen up....

2018-07-09 06:47:19 UTC  

"i dont consent"

2018-07-09 06:47:21 UTC  

now what

2018-07-09 06:47:31 UTC  

Well, you can feel free to move!

2018-07-09 06:47:52 UTC  

What you not consenting to?

2018-07-09 06:48:17 UTC  

Laws.