Message from @Poptarts
Discord ID: 465770662955450388
Let me address that.
Duty to enforce open carry
Yes. That is the law that was voted upon in California
It's the law that the people of California choose to live under. The police will enforce it.
you are actually misunderstanding me though.... i dont have a problem with them going after actual violent criminals
But open carrying despite the fact that agreed-upon law says no?
a *minority* of ppl who voted to impose their will over a majority of ppl
majority of ppl dont even vote
Not voting is a choice
So you're speaking out against a representative government, too.
Then whose fault is it for not participating in voting?
```if you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice!``` - Rush
but the whole idea is CONSENT of the governed
Apathy is consent technically
thats a weak argument because some ppl just magically give themselves the right to impose their will over others
I mean....
doesnt make it legitimate
Oh, what's that concept that goes around in SJW circles?
Where you have to ask consent every 15 seconds or some shit
Basically that, but in government form?
Consent is implied until stated otherwise
California checks the consent of the people every year in november.
We do?
@missdanger BINGO okay okayl... lets see here ...
okay everyone .... listen up....
"i dont consent"
now what
Well, you can feel free to move!
What you not consenting to?
Laws.
Apparently...
naw, still wrong. you hate what you dont understand
laws arent the same as colors of law
have you ever even heard of color of law?
evidently not
Oh, I have. 😆
Wait a minute, it seems like the topic is getting off tracked
you are not bound to color of law jurisdictions arbitrarily and absolutely
Well under our somewhat weird ass legal system, you are still under the jurisdiction of US domestic laws even if you dont consent. My house my rule kinda stuff
municipal codes and statutes are not the same as laws