It's weak.

Mid-debate, HERE'S AN HOURLONG VIDEO!

Also, your recommended videos are now fucked btw.

If you have to default to someone else for your arguments, you don't grasp them nearly well enough.

lol they ARE a class of people with different "rules" for them than us

they are part of the actual ruling class .... just takes some common sense to realize

Whites are a class of people with different rules for them than us.

They are part of the actual ruling class... just takes some common sense to realize.

LOL now you just trolling

feel free to peace out then in that case

Is there a TL;DR version of that video?

^ ^ ^

there are NO laws that whites have that minorities and POC dont have too ...... totally different than the current police/citizen paradigm

It's not, though.

yeah, i already said it, they are part of the ruling class .... just takes some common sense to realize

~~Who, white people?~~

it is diffent bcuz there are regulation and "color of law" in place that privilegs police to extra rights they just magically give themselves out of thin air

Also, it's not trolling

I'm taking your argument at face value and showing you the generalizations.

If it looked like trolling, I'd suggest that it's because there was an uncomfortable truth to it.

What are those privilege?

Police don't have extra rights.

They have duties.

Duties put upon them by the municipalities they serve.

If you're advocating for private security firms

i already went over this ... police in CA for example are allowed to open carry... us plebians are not

It will end no different than the police.

they have a duty to enforce that only THEY are allowed to open carry and make sure that other citizens than themselves are not?

just one example

Gross misrepresentation

another example is consequences of assault.... police are allowed to threaten assualt on non-violent ppl who pose no threat just for the sake of compliance

gross misrepresentation? how so? am i wrong?

You can be correct on facts, and incorrect in how you portray the situation at the same time.

seems like youre very triggered .... its okay.... relax man... lol

Projecting, much?

Not sure whether this analogy works, but the consequences of assault reminds me of the privilege that tenured professors have on their work/speeches

you touch a police in a unwanted or welcoming way, they can body slam you, arrest you, and throw you in a cage.... but they can do the same to you for NO GOOD reason against ppl non-violent who pose no danger or threat merely for the sake of forced compliance

So an argument in favor of chaos then.

Let me address that.

Duty to enforce open carry

Yes. That is the law that was voted upon in California