No, for right now AI is better with us, sure.

Cyborg teams are better than, just AI chess players.

But that's not always going to be the case.

by that time we'll integrate, and become part-AI

I doubt it.

^

Also how do we know that's not always going to be the case?

There've been plenty of predictions that we would meld into some total consciousness in the past.

Also a robot doesn't have to be perfect it just has to be more productive than a human.

you doubt it? We already can to an extent

Or hat some kind of social system *must* emerge and then it fails miserably, repeatedly.

And I'm saying when the robot starts getting more productive, people will fill in the weak parts or essentially merge themselves in the AI.

Bear in mind also that you'll never stop innovation nor will you ever stop scarcity.

Man, I won't even let myself get a RFID tag, you want me to integrate with AI, are you fucking insane?

"integrate" does not necessarily imply body modification.

Though it could.

Also, it calls into mind an interesting question. Could there be counter-reactionary societies that decide they want to freeze themselves in time? Like the Amish?

An automated interface,

You feed the AI information,
The AI uses that to run things

If it was a general AI it wouldn't need you to feed anything into it.

Even compared to the 90s we are pretty heavily integrated just through cell phones.

And there's alot of stuff that people did in the 90s that we just don't anymore.

if it was a general aI you most certainly have to feed something into it

It can't make assumptions

Cell phones aren't AI.

Youtubes search algorithm for example

Cant run without information you fed it initially

No, it's an integral part of AI. Cell phones are a big part of how Google has so much data to use.

Cell phones are a sensor not AI.

Furthermore, Youtube's search engine is heavily human made.

whatever, you see my point, though, right?

They're IO, it'd be like call a key board integration with a computer.

That's a pretty important part though.

okay lets define AI then

Cuz we're talking alongside each otehr now

^

General AI, is defined as is the intelligence of a machine that could successfully perform any intellectual task that a human being can. It is a primary goal of some artificial intelligence research and a common topic in science fiction and future studies. Artificial general intelligence is also referred to as "strong AI",[1] "full AI"[2] or as the ability of a machine to perform "general intelligent action".[3] Academic sources reserve "strong AI" to refer to machines capable of experiencing consciousness.

cuz literally

AI can mean a machine making a choice, to a fully functional strong AI that can think on its own and is self-aware

Thats "Strong AI"

"Weak AI" is literally the system that makes street lights go out the moment theres enough light in the air

@Dennafen should a Norton bombsight count at GAI then?

No.

Calculating ballistic trajectories is an intellectual task, is it not?

No.

Does Google's search count?

How about ye olde internet indexes.

Nope.