We *could* but that would just be a point for you.

I do understand that you are against the monopoly on force

See, my principles call for a solid set of definitions before conversation can really happen.

lol ok im not your boss

The only thing you can do with monopolies is break them up

Holding companies shouldn't be a thing, for one thing.

im not even sure you could have a solid set of definitions if a language itself is inherently ambiguous

We have books for that.

This game has rules.

yeah and i think market competition breaks up monopolies, while traditional governments causes them to form

DnD has the core rulebook, we have dictionaries.

corporations seems to inherit the monopoly aspect of the state through lobbying and regulatory capture and so on

even government contracting

Oh absolutely. it's disgusting.

When you think of just how much power Google has

i believe this is absolutely inevitable as long as people have a belief that the state is necessary

You start to see where the archetypal Cyber-Punk dystopia comes from.

States can be reformed.

We have a process. if we could just get people to use it

and it'd be a hell of a lot easier to do that than to convince people that a state isn't needed.

with a hell of a lot less bloodshed, too.

well good luck

Yeah, I know. You don't think a descent down that path would be bloody. If you don't think that would be the case, you miss just how unprincipled most people are.

"normies" are low info voters

If you surround yourself with principled people, it's easy to forget.

people got no time to research cause they live the grind

well the harder i would push my beliefs on people, the bloodier it would be i suppose

Rarely is there ever a revolution that occurs without bloodshed.

I mean, I guess Canada got theirs peacefully just by asking politely...

not a revolution

that was essentially just a break off

A relocation or elimination of power.

how bloody was the industrial revolution?

tru

i guess its the matter of type

hundreds of thousands.

i mean in a sense it WAS bloody

cause no labor laws and stuff

maybe you cant think of the bloodless revolutions because they were silent and not really emphasized

https://www.quora.com/How-many-workers-died-during-the-first-Industrial-Revolution-in-Great-Britain-Germany-and-France-due-to-unsafe-working-conditions-poverty-related-diseases-and-police-repression-of-protest-movements

the crypto-anarchists believes that technology will drive the anarchist change and that it's inevitable that the state will lose governing control over the masses