Message from @Gary Payton Tribute Account
Discord ID: 495045371400159254
``` he is humble enough to know that```
LOOOOOOL, no. See the Allsup video (though I've not seen it), but the existance of that video proves this claim wrong
oh ok
interesting
does sargon think he is that good?
You can test in-group preference iwth monkeys or chimps or crows
i saw him being humble in front of peterson and few times in his videos
so yeah i assumed he was
>allsup
Kek
like, james allsup?
that cunt that's reprimanding us brits for not getting a hard brexit, even though we can't cause May won't allow it?
Yes, because Allsup called Sargon out for some shit he does (like Insult Metakur with a UKIP Account), but basically he calls for Farrage to lead UKIP
ye
like farrage can now
i understand trying to criticise the politics and policies, but get research done before hand
He pulled out the dumb fake news pedo line. Also I had heard someone else was running the UKIP account but I can't confirm that
Sargon doesn't control @warplanpurple
Which makes Allsup's whole video fakenews
Kavanaugh is an alcoholic molester, change my mind
Impossible. Burden of Proof is on you.
If you'd like to discuss the merits of your argument, I'm game, but since this is an accusation, I'll need your argument first.
K.
So, a friend sent me a video, it's in Portuguese however there is an interesting part talking about the language used for Obamacare and how the left or as it is in the video title the ideas of Saul Alinksy talk about the change of language https://youtu.be/i11taVO1hIY?t=2646
I for one never had heard about this guy. Although he died in the 70's his ideas are very much what the left is today. I would encourage you guys to look into Saul Alinksy's life to learn about today's left.
You never heard of Saul Alinksy? His book Rules for Radicals is the playbook of the left.
aren't there thousands of versions?
nah
Yeah I never heard of him before. In the beginning of the video he mentions that kind of proves his ideas right
Not many people know about him
I'm really confused by Tim's stance on Ford.
There's nobody coming forward to confirm the allegations and everyone has denied it ever took place. But I still believe Ford because her story isn't especially lurid. Her story seems coached and she's lied on the issue of flying. But she's probably telling the truth. She's being coached, but they wouldn't have told her to avoid stating things that might cause red flags nor would they have rehearsed these talks to insure she seemed genuine. All the evidence points one way (her claims are false at worst, un-provable and contradicted at best)
Yet, she's still being truthful.
About the only way he could resolve the whole thing is if he thinks these new guys claiming to be the actual assailants are telling the truth. But those are anonymous persons and the whole thing is so weird it's going to take some rather crazy evidence to prove. I *think* Tim is alleging that the Democrats put her up to this (which is actually far worse on the Democrats part than her lying) and she's just horribly mistaken.
But frankly, I find it all kind of meandering. Is the assertion that her story is true? It would seem to contradict all evidence Tim is laying out.
Will agree the whole thing is pretty disgusting and things are getting way too intense.
She isn't being Truthfull.
@pratel I agree. Even accepting Tim's explanation she's letting herself be used for political reasons, which still points to her being dishonest. I stated this in general chat, but unfortunately this means I know I can't trust Tim in the future on any sexual assault cases.
Tim doesn't understand if he defends every accuser (he says everyone is shit who attacks survivors) he loses credibility every time they're shown to be liar.
At best Ford is knowingly letting herself be used as a weapon against a man she isn't sure about. At worst she is a slandering political hack.
Well, knowing he has a blind spot doesn't mean he doesn't have credibility. He has proven to be accurate and truthful in most other areas so I still trust him.
I think he just doesn't want to accuse people willy nilly
Oh, I do mean in this particualr area
Man I didn't get to watch all of it live. but just saw a clip of the polygraph part. She admits crying through the polygraph test. Doesn't being over emotional through a polygraph test invalidate it?
I don't know enough about Polygraphs..but aren't they inadmissible in court because they just aren't really all that accurate?
I was just pointing out that it almost definitely gave even worse results if she was crying while giving the test