Liberals seem to look at race in a superficial way and therefore dismiss it and fail to see that it seems to be an important factor.

👏 twitter 👏 is 👏 not 👏 real 👏 life 👏

could you elaborate, @Slavic Infidel

Everytime i see that i think "Great, why dont you cite fucking 4 chan as public consensus"

@Slavic Infidel you forget that they make it important when it suits their needs

>4chan is more diverse than the SJWs

i dont think so

I know

@Kyubae Marxists are not Liberals

but its still not a representation of the wider public

they've just been hiding behind the word

"Suits their needs". And whats wrong with that? @Kyubae

well duh, 4chan is from everywhere, but SJW's are almost all white, middle/upper class

@Beemann uh, yea, where did i say they were lol

@Kyubae where are "Liberals" using race?

@Slavic Infidel idk man, double standards

in race-based admissions

to be "fair"

that's not liberalism

yea its not

Promotions as well.

where did i say it was liberalism?

oh

i see

yeah, just wanted to set clear lines as to what we're talking about

see, when people say liberals, idk if they are referring to real liberals, are the far left

thats actually the complete opposite of what liberalism is

because people use it in both contexts

its bastardized in the US and its starting to seep over to europe

how am i supposed to discern between them in regular conversation with randoms

the people using idpol on the "left" are just using Marxist Social Conflict Theory applied to race basically

@Beemann I believe the term is "intersectionality"

^in a very narrow scope

and then relabeling their opposition to the status quo by any means necessary as cultural relativism

which makes it even more ridiculous

@Beemann Tbh I seem to be using nationality and race synonymously. And that is incorrect of me. But its something identitarians seem to do as well. I need to think about it a bit more.

thats fair yeah

why the fuck do marxists have control over university admissions

oh its cause the universities are overrun with them

because where else are marxists going to get work but in academia?

"marxists" and "work" dont REALLY go together well