Message from @Faticati
Discord ID: 516625823298748431
@DrWittMDPhD he finger banged his little asian on livestream
Jim is a good by who don’t do nuttin wrong
It is what Sargon said. Stop being a drama whore m8
No Sargon was implying it was sexual
Because we are the little sweetie squad
>getting butthurt and overly sensitive because you're an admitted dickrider
Nice one
A quote from the thinkery “Jim is about 31 interrogating a 17 year old about his 14 year old boyfriend”
The 17 year old was a 19 year old jim was pedo busting as per usual
Soygon is worthless garbage
And id never ride jimbos dick we are faggots
So is it the physical age that counts solely? Or are we going to see JF exposed soon?
Cuz it's about consistency right? And not just being a patreon cockgobbler after saying you wouldnt stoop to that
If evidence comes out against one of the most prolific internet detectives ill pick up a pitchfork too
thats not what I asked
Given that Jim is big on guilt by association, why does he not absolutely destroy JF and Ralph, given that both are guilty of the shit he claims to hate? Why does he choose to associate with them?
He is in no way a fan of guilt by association
He is a fan of guilt by being guilty
Like sargon being in krauts discord
he was blaming Vee for shit "his buddies" were doing. In his little fit on Vee's stream he absolutely did fall back on guilt by association, and when it was pointed out that this didnt work given his friends, he made that comment on rolling in the shit to take other people down
Source
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xIfbyhSx3 somewhere in this fucking stream
4 minutes into this one is where soygon implies jim is a pedo for pedo hunting
Im not watching a whole stream
I got the timestamp you do the same
Jim's on that stream for like 10 minutes and I've got other shit to do anyway
You sleepy sargon?
>everyone who disagrees with me is Sargon
What are you, a twitter thot?
No its called funny
Also as far as I'm aware the argument was not that Jim only had young viewers, just that he had goaded his young viewers into doing his dirty work. I don't really care either way, because Sargon is full of shit a good chunk of the time anyway, but going for analytics to disprove that is some potato shit
Cuz sargon always gets sleepy when he is losing and now someone defending him also cant be bothered to make a cohesive argument
It's 10 minutes of a stream m8
Yeah facts are some potato shit
It's almost all Jim talking. As one of his groomed children you should love that :^)
I wish to speak with the voice that makes 1000 pedophiles run in fear
And makes all the skeptics beg for mercy
From what I'm seeing, they've provided a citation for their argument, while you've basically told them to look for your evidence for you.
This is some cringy shit. Maybe Jim really *does* have a potato squad :^)