it shows that the curve you've known since the "Bell Curve", wich featured way more than that, is not wrong.
The SAT of black is around 85% of that from white people.
I don't have sources, and the french IQ test may be different from yours, you can artificialy inflate your IQ result just by taking more and more IQ tests and memorizing solutions
in short: Its highly heritable. And Enviroment doesn't play a too big role in it.
Or other way around: Enviroment can ruin your potential (ie malnourished, stuff like that). But genetics limit it.
I guess the next logical question would be if genetics provably has an impact on IQ it would explain the bell curve. However further testing would need to be shown to verify that specific genetic variances linked to race have an impact on IQ. I think the easiest way to prove racial differences is to show statistics around the prevalence of certain genes that have been linked to mental ability among different races.
Where do you have the highest IQ? Where the Population was the densest in history...
Where have you low IQ? Where there weren't many people historically.
a corralation may be more likely, a direct result i would want to know how you account for animals with incredibly high birth rate and comparitive population density to dis-similar species and even similar species
```and are you arguing a direct result or a corrilation?```
Direct result because if you don't have money, Woman won't have children with you, so you need to be somewhat successful. To be successful you need relatively high IQ.
