i dont agree with the implication of social darwinism on the economic spectrum though

you can try and mitigate it

but it won't amount to anything

better people win

well yeah

simple as that

I think many people would have an easier time living

if they lived by that principle

but it shouldnt really be used to justify anything like what it justified in the gilded age

I mean whether its used for nefarious intent or not

its a universal truth regardless

yeah

i agree with that

people use the truth for no good all the time

a lot of people just justify monopolies and thngs like that and barely regualted free market capitalism with it though

I believe in social darwanism. Some people are just born to be average or wealthy or poor

the social darwinists of the Gilded Age were right

what

no

i mean

nothing was wrong about their perspective

it was right

they were better than everyone else

but still it justified monopolies and lassiez faire capitalism which was gay

workers' humiliating

well it does

thats a consequence

well yeah

but the job of a government

Life is never fair, stop trying to make it fair.

is to help the people

of the nation

the job of the government is to maintain the hierarchy

nothing more or nothing less

there will always be a hierarchy

@AngloAmericanGod I made this today.

Yes

but that hierarchy shouldnt be that drastic in the economic level

it has to use radical means to achieve a functional and stable hierarchy

based