Maybe. Excess bureaucracy's kind of just one of those side effects nobody's really figured out how to fix in a system that tries to be clean but. Well the system in place right now definitely isn't anything remotely close to that.

Two party system but it's still in a near constant state of gridlock.

the failure of the libertarian party could also be a reflection of the fact that people might just inherently gravitate towards authority

We either need a serious third contender or a dissolution of political parties.

Hell

ergo giant bureaucracy

I'd settle for a second.

dissolution of political parties isn't realistic

I know it's not.

humans form groups

And a full unfiltered democracy would be nothing short of terrifying.

yeah

It's nearly impossible to ask someone with power to give up power.

I mean, look at all the people lemming for Net neutrality to be kept in place, just shows the mob is retarded

Yeah, until you realize that Net Neutrality wasn't really officially a legal concept until during obama's second term

and that the internet did just fine without it thank you very much.

A fair number of the people arguing for net neutrality are definitely doing it in idiotic ways but the concept still isn't bad unfortunately.

yes it is

net neutrality is bad

Well okay, let me rephrase.

Purely from an open market perspective, it's bad.

Net neutrality isn't great. But the alternative is much worse.

Is it?

also wrong

Giant corporations that game the system and change laws to benefit themselves while screwing over anyone smaller than them.

The problem in place is the inability for a startup internet provider to be able to operate.

Stories of tiny ISPs trying to make ground getting shafted when they're basically legally crushed by the likes of comcast and verizon.

The market needs more freedom, not more restrictions.

Net Neutrality doesn't solve that.

indeed

net neutrality neuters competition

and innovation

I wouldn't go that far, necessarily

It's a distraction from what the real problems are, though.

the problem of small ISPs is high costs of entering the market

Disagree.

the infrastructure is very expensive, but competition could lessen those costs

There really isn't any competition though.

The infrastructure is impossible.

In a lot of places you see service from a single ISP.

also selective throttling is good in a variety of applications