Nope.

And that's kind of the problem.

well, yeah.

It's a problem regardless of who owns them

Something something title 2 let them handle the infrastructure, including improvements, which they've basically been slacking on because there's no reason to whatsoever.

or, sorry, i think they own many modules attached to the poles

Like I said

And the companies have gotten so big that the little guy isn't going to be able to bring them down.

5 up

10 down

I'm living in the past.

Net neutrality is definitely ugly, if you don't trust the government.

I don't.

But that's the only patchwork solution we have right now.

and they were concerned because any disruption of their equipment could harm thousands of customers' service

Create a different solution then.

The other option is 5 up 10 down with the threat that you're getting 1 up 2 down for everything that isn't Approved by Comcast™.

Because that's how everything seems to be poised to go.

Either that or them vacuuming up your data because there's no viable alternatives to the big 3.

that's entirely wrong dude

Many of the fears that you have about a lack of control with the FCC

removing net neutrality opens the door to competition and innovation, creating better service

the FTC already handles

abuses were handled before NN was established

and there rarely were abuses

there were like 4 but 3 of them were dismissed in court

ah-ha!

but you admit there WERE abuses!

Ban Fully Automatic Assault ISPs

https://a.uguu.se/77bvcwK1Zlvm_firefox_2018-05-07_01-17-39.png

Hmmm.

are u kekkin' on me rn fr

/sarcasm

i know vro

GEP what was that

I'm a little behind on the times. Wasn't aware they pushed the FTC as the replacement for net neutrality.

what are u saying vro

It was never pushed

it always existed.

FTC is the federal trade commission

I may have cited the wrong organization...