And he's against the loss of net neutrality.

is this loss?

It's arguing against the remote possibility of something maybe happening.

No ISPs that would be affected by Net Neutrality have made moves to do anything that would be stopped by Net Neutrality as passed in 2014

As I see it, Net Neutrality is largely fear mongering, and largely a distraction.

it doesn't matter to me if a conservative is against the loss of NN, I wan't to see data and reasons for why it would need to stay, and so far I haven't come across any evidence for keeping it

Sesta/Fosta are far more damaging than the loss of Net Neutrality is.

I honestly don't care that much about tech

I'm still trying to figure out why those were signed into law in the first place.

like, I just grabbed the issue because it was controversial and so I sought out data

Is it standard emotional "won't someone think of the children" crap or something else?

Basically, that.

yeah something like that

Well it explains why Trump signed it.

meanwhile in California they are enabling sex workers

"Eh."

Also decriminalizing intentionally spreading AIDS.

If it's consenting adults, eh.

bro.......

morals bro

The Good news is the California problem will sort itself out in a few years.

And yeah. That. Thaaaat was a concern that people stopped caring after about two days.

Are you talking about the split or something else.

@RyeNorth

what you mean

oh you know.

>:D

lol

I can't wait to move out

..Ah.

Oh you live in california?

yeah

I feel so bad for you dude. lol

Oh lord you're in that hell?

indeed

I know a guy who lives there.

He's stuck in a union that he was required to sign on with to start working at a grocery store.

We've got a guy in here that lives there. Currently going by Adolfcast.

lol

the beanie-wearing hitler avatar. 😛

He's been shafted repeatedly because the union doesn't actually do anything outside of taking people's paychecks.