'o'

oh yeah I forgot you can't own anything if you're a socialist

Tragic <a:pepeCoffee:528439564684099589>

yea

what a dysfunctional view of socialist policy

communist who benefits from the capitalist is not communist

🆙 | **teu pai leveled up!**

I do not know much the difference of communism and socialism

so because I dislike how corporations treat the worker I can't own a phone

quite a bit of difference mate

Sorry if I said shit.

@Sultan IV how do companies treat workers in their vision?

without unions and workers rights, badly

capitalism requires low paid cheap labour

my grandmother was an operative and was never communist, she worked from 7:00 to 19:00

the unions are no good for fucking no use only to make violent protests on the streets

violent protests are often justified

and it's not socialism's fault if your grandmother didn't know what her work was worth

justified with young middle-class imbeciles burning buses for the benefit of the working class?

what you're doing is cherry picking

and often the middle class people protesting prefer progressive values over socialism

she knew even why she was gone but after deepening she discovered the clowning and the intention of a dictatorship of the proletariat behind

I can say that I lived in a corporatist socialist country until 2018 (Brazil) and I saw how things worked out with a bunch of unfettered economic crises, lousy security, poor quality education, etc.

the Brazilian population tired and finally voted in a petite patriot and conservative

the problem with marxist style socialism is it's international and permits open borders

which can't uphold the state

it causes too many problems

when people talk about socialism they are usually talking about marxism, which isn't the only type of socialism

the question is that in no country has socialism / communism succeeded?

example of a modern socialist is venezuela

majority of the time the type of socialism implemented is marxism

it's an argument against karl marx, not socialist theory

ideologies like strasserism and national bolshevism have never been implemented before

and to a greater extent prussian socialism

there is no use hitting the same key every time there is no argument gabible against a system in which the government controls everything that causes taxes and less investors in the country thus generating low income and subsequently the entrepreneurs leave the country because they were not benefiting from what it does with that the poorest worker is unprepared, has greatly helped the worker

i've told you what you're hitting at and it doesn't effect me because i'm not a marxist

so I don't know what else to tell you

But was not karl marx the father of communism?

you're acting as if karl marx is the be all and end all of communist theory

and that it wouldn't be possible to change it

I do not understand anything anymore now ._.