That should be okay if your poor

Not okay

But not punished by death

The problem is when done they use it as an excuse to kill the poor

Whej they are hungry

Thats why it failed

that's France in the 1800s

I am not cool with that

@Boo France was complicated. But never was it like that (except a tiny bit under Robespierre, but that's 1793)

Only killing if its stealing money. Stealinf food is community service and you can keep the food

Its insured anyways

huh

Stealing insurances?

i'm not one for the death of those stealing food

but it should be punished

why would you give the thumbs up on a crime lol

I don't know about you but i feel like imprisoning people for their entire life for stealing a bit of food is a bit brutal

Seems like ya are describing russia people :3

A great country

Working very well

Plenty of allies

i assume you live in russia?

@Archatton

Nop @bink. But I did in the past a little bit.

No not stealing insurances. They are poor and stealing food its community service and they can keep the food. That way you pay for it in work.

where in russia?

Not saying imprison hungry people

Exact oppisite

Sankt-Petersburg

I was little though

What I am talking about has never been done

there are certainly far worse places in russia

It was 15 years ago

Let me be clear about one thing. Killing criminals might sound like a good punishment but here's a few problems with that view

Wait

1. What if the convict is actually innocent?

But I still remember visitng some poor parts north and east of it with ma parents quickly

They are not criminals if they kill rape or steal for 1

They are evil

And 2 it must be proven in a court of law

@Solid Snake Plissken sounds as applicable as a socialist idea for me.