Message from @Ivanfr
Discord ID: 450696185674596372
whats the problem with that
a trial about grooming
he talks about grooming
I dont see anything wrong with it
He didnt say X person is a criminal
ok.. so some guy gets accused of rape (lets say for argument hes innocent, but lets face it his life is over now) .. and he walks around outside the courthouse talking about "the patriarchy" and "sexual harassment" and rape... oh but its nothing to do with this case...
so what
is not ilegall
a child could link them
oh come on
I would think he's a nut job and ignore
and he's allowed to speak because 1A here in the US
wacka you are reaching very far to try to say that he did something wrong
The law is clear
u cannot say X person is a criminal unless it has been proven
otherwise u can talk about the topic as much as u want
well he used the word "alleged"
exactly
😃
thats the magic wor
even TR said that
in his video
he added it anyway, and clarified
I dont understand why ppl try to make it seem like he did something wrong lol
is so obvious that he is in the right
what country do you live ivanfr?
Spain
I'm in the US and it's obvious he did nothign wrong
regardless of the shitty law we're talking about him breaking or contempt of court
or whatever
depends on your point of view... if those lads were completely innocent, and end up going to jail because of a tainted jury... Id say thats wrong
that has nothing to do with TR
at all
also, here in the US, we assume (and they usually are) that people can be impartial regardless of news
and if that can't be ensured, the jury is sequestered
as when they did in the OJ simpsion trial
who was declared not guilty, even though he most likely is.
so either you can control the information to 12 people, or control an entire population of speech
seems like one's at least a bit possible
Europe is a shithole