as far as I know

dude, he went on a 2 hr rant about grooming gangs... Im not saying they arent happening.. and if theyre guilty I hope they die in prison... but srsly

whats the problem with that

a trial about grooming

he talks about grooming

I dont see anything wrong with it

He didnt say X person is a criminal

ok.. so some guy gets accused of rape (lets say for argument hes innocent, but lets face it his life is over now) .. and he walks around outside the courthouse talking about "the patriarchy" and "sexual harassment" and rape... oh but its nothing to do with this case...

so what

is not ilegall

a child could link them

oh come on

I would think he's a nut job and ignore

and he's allowed to speak because 1A here in the US

wacka you are reaching very far to try to say that he did something wrong

The law is clear

u cannot say X person is a criminal unless it has been proven

otherwise u can talk about the topic as much as u want

well he used the word "alleged"

exactly

😃

thats the magic wor

d

even TR said that

in his video

he added it anyway, and clarified

I dont understand why ppl try to make it seem like he did something wrong lol

is so obvious that he is in the right

what country do you live ivanfr?

Spain

I'm in the US and it's obvious he did nothign wrong

regardless of the shitty law we're talking about him breaking or contempt of court

or whatever

depends on your point of view... if those lads were completely innocent, and end up going to jail because of a tainted jury... Id say thats wrong

that has nothing to do with TR

at all

also, here in the US, we assume (and they usually are) that people can be impartial regardless of news

and if that can't be ensured, the jury is sequestered

as when they did in the OJ simpsion trial

who was declared not guilty, even though he most likely is.

so either you can control the information to 12 people, or control an entire population of speech