because it is a one-sided analysis.

How is it "one side"?

It's literally the trade deal's provisions.

And this is from BBC, a left leaning source.

you really aren't good with numbers, are you

again with your left and right bullshit.

Show me where I'm wrong.

Stop being so american

https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2020-01-15/trumps-china-deal-enormous-cost

https://www.nber.org/papers/w25672.pdf

fucking read

god damn americans

Quote me what I'm supposed to read

need to be spoonfed?

"Even after the agreement, the average U.S. tariff on China imports will still be 19.3%, a modest reduction from the pre-agreement level of 21% and more than six times its level of 3% before Trump launched the tariff war."

Yes

This is phase one.

fuck your phase one

Not a whole deal, but that doesn't mean it's bad.

phase two will be worse.

Like I said $200 billion boost in exports is great.

you got optimism bias

trump goggles

whatever the orange man does is good

The 200 billion doesn't lie?

I'm not american, I got no stake in this

I couldn't give less of a fuck

Why are non-Americans so profane and dumb?

that's not the full picture even if true

you moron.

See insults again.

you didn't respond even after being spoonfed

I just did

you just repeat the 200 bn made up number.

It isn't "made up", it's in the deal's provisions.

The article talks about "it doesn't go far enough to answer structural issues", but this is a phase one deal. Not a full trade deal.

Phase 2 will answer subsidies etc.

you dont know shit about anything, do you?

Sounds like a loaded question

I clearly understand economics, how do you think I'm schooling you?

"oh it doesn't matter that we lost 500 billion over here when we gained 200 billion in exports"