Borderline anarchists

uh

at least they can be funny at some times

true

so you want to have one nation for the world with more like a communist regime?

(or kinda)

Well yeah i suppose but it'd be a bit deeper with things like dominions/local governments

In an ideal world all united

GG @✠𝐓𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐬 𝐝𝐢𝐞 𝐓𝐢𝐠𝐞𝐫 𝐓𝐚𝐧𝐤✠, you just advanced to level 2!

but

so more like decentralise

Thats not possible

Federation-y

yeah i see

i think it will be unstable to manage

or at least unify a continent would be easier, but hard to do

Probably yeah

Maybe more like subcontinents like the Raj

but when you look it now, it's still a good mess

Yeah

I also have some socialist ideals so idk if monarchism exactly fits

because

the only reason was that britain was controlling racial and religious conflict

so it was more stable

Well yeah

but it's collapse at the end

well idk if you'd call it a collapse

Its more like a withdrawl

because it didnt blow up and die

yes

like the soviets basically did

they withdraw because it was worse and worse to manage it

well yeah

it pretty much was prime time for it to end

the beginning of a new era sorta made it force the hand of the british and the french

i know that people think that monarchy is more ring wing thing(a lot of true in it), but i know some people (not personally), that are more socialist-communist and wish to be a in kingdom

Okay dont meme me please but

I am stupid in this so

not a meme i m serious

I think i'm probably a social-monarchist

and because you're statist it's pretty close