Message from @LotheronPrime

Discord ID: 462715298391261224


2018-06-30 20:13:47 UTC  

Other elec vehicle companies are in the black, tesla keeps in the red. I think Elon is already started to pull out

2018-06-30 20:14:03 UTC  

maybe. but it just shows it's possible

2018-06-30 20:14:20 UTC  

even if it always doesn't work out

2018-06-30 20:16:05 UTC  

There are viable ways already, tesla just isn't one of them. Look at 'zero motorcycles' for example, they have sustainable businesses and even race bikes already, at a competitive price. Tesla is still too over priced for normal people to buy one

2018-06-30 20:17:50 UTC  

When people understand they can convert their 1992 corola to an electric vehicle for us$5k then what does tesla have to offer?

2018-06-30 20:18:20 UTC  

Buy a corvette and convert it cheaper than a pries

2018-06-30 20:19:41 UTC  

that's always been possible

2018-06-30 20:19:58 UTC  

that being said Tesla has helped advance the technology

2018-06-30 20:20:22 UTC  

and expensive to cheaper has always been their business model

2018-06-30 20:21:59 UTC  

Nazi's helped advance science, Tesla helps advance science, Elon Musk is a space Nazi for sure

2018-06-30 20:22:01 UTC  

I personally think mass electric cars are a pipe dream

2018-06-30 20:22:38 UTC  

ooooh are we playing 6th degree nazi separation

2018-06-30 20:23:28 UTC  

Electric cars are no more efficient, atm the power production is worse than just using a petroleum engine, when solar is advanced enough then the production of panels will be in parr as bad

2018-06-30 20:23:45 UTC  

yeah

2018-06-30 20:23:57 UTC  

electrics are 100% efficient

2018-06-30 20:24:04 UTC  

charging them isn't

2018-06-30 20:24:14 UTC  

and range is major issue

2018-06-30 20:24:42 UTC  

Lets use petroleum fuel to make electricity, have a power loss in the transfer, and then claim the car itself is efficient.

2018-06-30 20:24:48 UTC  

yup

2018-06-30 20:24:51 UTC  

stupid

2018-06-30 20:25:23 UTC  

charging via solar or wind or hell even nuclear power would be ideal

2018-06-30 20:26:17 UTC  

One of the first things I learned as an electrician is IR² (otherwise known as power losses or Copper loss). It is unavoidable and the more system the bigger the loss

2018-06-30 20:27:45 UTC  

you can always add more copper though

2018-06-30 20:27:58 UTC  

Second gripe - Lets dig a hole in the ground and make non biodegradable materials to make a car that is mildly better than the old car that is made from biodegradable minerals

2018-06-30 20:28:12 UTC  

but generally the batteries are close to motor

2018-06-30 20:28:23 UTC  

oh I agree

2018-06-30 20:28:35 UTC  

I think more should be done with hydrogen

2018-06-30 20:28:37 UTC  

personally

2018-06-30 20:28:57 UTC  

Battery to motor = low loss
Power to battery = excessive loss

2018-06-30 20:28:59 UTC  

still a power issue

2018-06-30 20:29:25 UTC  

well they just crank up the volts and lower the amps to reduce loss but yeah

2018-06-30 20:29:32 UTC  

Hydrogen is a logical choice, but no taxable

2018-06-30 20:29:33 UTC  

still an issue

2018-06-30 20:30:06 UTC  

hydrogen is the only renewable material that can replace petrol 1:1 basically

2018-06-30 20:31:11 UTC  

V=I/R means cranking up volts and lowering amps is a cover up, less 'copper' can be used, but it will deteriorate quicker and the same loss is still present, just in slightly different areas

2018-06-30 20:31:52 UTC  

vir isn't a power loss equation lop

2018-06-30 20:31:54 UTC  

lol

2018-06-30 20:32:06 UTC  

Lets lose 5 watts at each transformer to save 5 watts between transformers

2018-06-30 20:32:27 UTC  

Vir is a major part in understanding ir2

2018-06-30 20:34:00 UTC  

And no vir doesn't mean loss, but it undoubtedly means power is power no matter how you modify it, and ir² means each modification is a loss

2018-06-30 20:34:57 UTC  

Unless you have a zero resistance tranny that naturally runs at absolute zero temp, it's a loss