1. Where did you find us? World union of national revolutionary’s
2. How old are you? (We need to know your real age to treat you as the way it fits your biological brain work). 13
3. What is your nationality? (The country you live in). I am Australian but my family moved to America
4. How do you think about Siege by James Mason ? Cringe I guess
5. What is your opinion on equality? Equality is a good thing in most cases
6. What is your ideology? (Make it Detailed) Marxism Leninism, it is an ideology composed by Joseph Stalin that combines the original ideas and teachings of Karl Marx and Fredrich Engles with Vladimir Lenin’s contributions and application of his ideas and original Marxist theory to the new conditions of capitalism
7. What ideology/worldview do you want to learn and how long have you been with politics? I want to learn more about fascism and third position it’s ideology’s
8. What is the ideal world of yours and why? A world where communism is established, I belevie this would be ideal because we would have economic, and social equality under this system
9. What do you think about nowadays's popular culture and why? it is not good, and is infecting the youths of today
10. What is your religion? I have no religion
11. What is your opinion on marx and Marxism? Karl Marx was a revolutionary thinker who changed the world
12. What’s your thoughts on race? Would you call yourself a civic, cultural, or ethnic nationalist? I would call myself neither
13. What’s your opinion on imperialism? It is a system where profit is valued over human life therefor it is bad
14. Are you willing to work with people that are different from you ideologically? Yes
15. What are your thoughts on acclerationism? And if you support it what type of acclerationist would you consider yourself to be? Accelerationism is just rushing capitalism instead of letting historical materialism take place

@Rice. answer vetting when you have the time

<@526134148889444354> Answer the vetting

1. Invited by @Cjxproxy Ψ
2. 19
3. Canada
4. I have no opinion of it as I have not read it, it seems quite popular though.
5. I believe in mans natural and necessary submission before nature as a universality, and I am a follower of the faith delivered by Christ for all. However the acceptance of the reality of racial differances is not antithetical to Christian tenets, as it is clear that European people possess much greater qualities than any other race (racial realism is not hate, unless it is used to justify unrighteous indulgences in occasions of sin). I believe in a necessary class devision, as I find the prevalent occurance of the poor putting themselves into debt to have some air of opulence and facade of wealth (ie. middle class familys who own a trailer and go to disney world every year and can only afford 1 and 1/2 kids due to their mortgage) disgusting. So yes equality exists in mans submission to universal and objective truths, inequality necessarily exists based on race, class and nation. Not all people, cultures, faiths, sexes are the same and they should not be placed on the same echelon as such an action would be destructive to the beauty of their difference, and insulting to the ones of higher caliber.
6. Agrarianism (traditional living, sanctity and supremacy of the rural peasantry, BLUT UND BODEN, anti ashphalt culture, sustainable agricultural and husbandry practices, neo-luddite, ecofascism), Monarchism (the devine right of kings to lead their dutiful people under God, loyalist and cavalier), Fascism (Nat-Soc/Mosley with corporatist one party parliamentary model, volkstaat to serve the people/race first and foremost, ethnonationalism)
7. Id like to learn more fascist economic policies, and ive been politically active since my youth...for 3 years now have i been aware of the impotence of the mainstream conservative and have left for more alternative movements

8. The ideal world for me would be one of insularity and agrarianism. The globalist, large nation scale democratic world is decadent and in its decay, we are living in the fall of our Rome. The church would be the only international institution, however the different branches of the one Holy, Catholic and Apostolic church contain expressions of faith specific to and dependent upon the culture where that church is located (as an Anglican I especially understand this as my faith is the historic English expression of Catholicism). So less international consolidation of power, more independance (like the global interference in Rhodesia and SA was absoloutely inappropriate and the Apartheid was a successful idea that collapsed due to international sympathy to the perpetrators of significant problems in these formerly 1st world countries. Also, a world of necessity and inconsistency would be beautiful as it would return man to its state of nature and would reintroduce the environmental factors for a genuine experience of life (ie less extraodinary healthcare, big families, no urban culture, dependence on the land for sustainance, small communities and industries, meaning found through faith and the advancement of the nation...) So agararianism and very nationalistic and traditional small countries, a real possiblity for after the impending collapse.
9. it is intentionally degenerate to enforce individualism and existentialism, destroy the white family unit, infiltrate and destroy the objective source of truth (ie the Church) and replace real cultural identities with universal niggatry, savagery and avarice so to perpetuate the global greed which fuels the world.
10. Christian, high church CofE Anglocatholicism, traditional theology with big focus on sacramental life and prayer...the religion of my forefathers

11. Jewish bolschevism that usurped the devine right of the Tsar and tried to replace Religion with a secular institution which could not truly provide the same social function, should have been based around volk if they attempted such a thing.
12. From what Ive written above it is probably clear Im pretty ethnonationalist, other than the universality of truth and faith (which do conform the race/culture) race/culture is an absoloute which necessarily defines man.
13. Good for europeans so long as it suites the people and not companies.
14. absloutely
15. Ive read Mike Ma's Harrasment Archetecture and I believe that violence may be the catylist which activates change, however the foundational element in change is an appropriate culture (think petri dish and bacterial culture). In Weimar Germany, the culture was pretty ready for change and the Beer hall putsch was a necessary effort (not entirely fruitful but...) so to gain ground for the NSDAP. I wont be hanging people, but Id put some bricks through windows. One problem with accelerationism is that it does cause alot of peripheral damage to the innocent (both by active harrassment of the vile persons, and the absurd social changes imposed by those vile persons) so it is a necessary evil, yet I will not waste my shot by firing first. I want to keep my life for family and farm, not to be a Brenton Tarrant and waste it all (love his manifesto tho, just dont do kill people untill the time is right...although that was not his philosophy)

Alot of this is from my work in progress manifesto so kinda long but it is the short version of my perspective

Backup acc

I'm Adolf Stalin, my account got nuked

You also?

Who are you?

Leavikk

1. 2nd Internet Junta
2. 16
3. America
4. It’s kinda gay ngl
5. We are equal in the eyes of God but some of us are better than others
6. Fascist, I believe in a big government enforcing Christianity on everyone.
7. None tbh
8. Jesus as the King of the World
9. It’s idol worshipping, anyone with a brain can see this
10. Christian, Protestant
11. Satanic Ideology
12. Ethnic Nationalist, all races can earn salvation but God made us separate for a reason
13. Based
14. Depends
15. Accelerationism is based but I wouldn’t call myself one

<@&589977740166430744>

<@526134148889444354> @Rice. <@692673065380872252> answer vetting when yall can

@Rice. <@526134148889444354> answer vetting

@F Δ ϟ H @jayelectric333 answer vetting questions when you have the time

Sorry we don’t let in natsocs

Really?

Then why is the title 3rd position?

Ahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahha

Bruh

Well he’s gone

What the fuck is up with these natsocs and not reading the fucking rules

Or the about for that matter

That's a sad thing

Makes for a good laugh tho

Natsocs are very common in last years

Idk why they keep showing up on here

And what friend gave him the invite

Idk

Natsocs can't fucking read

Natsocs are zionists without any of the benefits of being a Zionist

^

Like seriously I don’t know how clearer I can make it that NO NATSOCS ARE ALLOWED (except for Strasserists)

Finally someone got it

Another one

We need to make some punch cards, 8 natsocs in vetting and your sandwich is free

lol

Frankly most dont care

1. I found the link in some other right wing server

2. 15

3. Slovenia

4. Didnt read it yet

5. Depends what you mean by equality,but if you mean it like that everyone should have equal wages then no,but equality of opportunity is based and equality before the law is fine aswell

6. Strasserism,guild socialism,civic nationalism,authoritarianism,social conservatism,planned economy,idealism,natsyn(in some way),anti-imperialism,anti-zionism...

7. Now im probably the most interested in national bolshevism,ML and fascism
I've been into politics for about 2 years(a bit less) now

8. To ensure the existance of european peoples and to preserve their culture also to create a socialist(or even better would be strasserist) state in europe

9. Totaly Degenerate

10. Im atheist

11. Only based marxists are MLs,i know some MLs that are even socially conservative and nationalist. But marxism in general is based only economically

12.
Civic nationalist,i think race does exist and it is biological construct(rather then social construct) but i think its unimportant,also because white peoples have different cultures, languages,ethnicitis etc. So i think its hard to identify only with race,also i dont think someone is inferior or should be even enslaved because of their race

13. I am definitly against todays capitalist imperialism and im against imperialism in general too so i would consider myself anti-imperialist

14. Yes

15.
It does not make sense to me,so no

16.
Yes,GG