1. Invited by @Cjxproxy Ψ
2. 19
3. Canada
4. I have no opinion of it as I have not read it, it seems quite popular though.
5. I believe in mans natural and necessary submission before nature as a universality, and I am a follower of the faith delivered by Christ for all. However the acceptance of the reality of racial differances is not antithetical to Christian tenets, as it is clear that European people possess much greater qualities than any other race (racial realism is not hate, unless it is used to justify unrighteous indulgences in occasions of sin). I believe in a necessary class devision, as I find the prevalent occurance of the poor putting themselves into debt to have some air of opulence and facade of wealth (ie. middle class familys who own a trailer and go to disney world every year and can only afford 1 and 1/2 kids due to their mortgage) disgusting. So yes equality exists in mans submission to universal and objective truths, inequality necessarily exists based on race, class and nation. Not all people, cultures, faiths, sexes are the same and they should not be placed on the same echelon as such an action would be destructive to the beauty of their difference, and insulting to the ones of higher caliber.
6. Agrarianism (traditional living, sanctity and supremacy of the rural peasantry, BLUT UND BODEN, anti ashphalt culture, sustainable agricultural and husbandry practices, neo-luddite, ecofascism), Monarchism (the devine right of kings to lead their dutiful people under God, loyalist and cavalier), Fascism (Nat-Soc/Mosley with corporatist one party parliamentary model, volkstaat to serve the people/race first and foremost, ethnonationalism)
7. Id like to learn more fascist economic policies, and ive been politically active since my youth...for 3 years now have i been aware of the impotence of the mainstream conservative and have left for more alternative movements

8. The ideal world for me would be one of insularity and agrarianism. The globalist, large nation scale democratic world is decadent and in its decay, we are living in the fall of our Rome. The church would be the only international institution, however the different branches of the one Holy, Catholic and Apostolic church contain expressions of faith specific to and dependent upon the culture where that church is located (as an Anglican I especially understand this as my faith is the historic English expression of Catholicism). So less international consolidation of power, more independance (like the global interference in Rhodesia and SA was absoloutely inappropriate and the Apartheid was a successful idea that collapsed due to international sympathy to the perpetrators of significant problems in these formerly 1st world countries. Also, a world of necessity and inconsistency would be beautiful as it would return man to its state of nature and would reintroduce the environmental factors for a genuine experience of life (ie less extraodinary healthcare, big families, no urban culture, dependence on the land for sustainance, small communities and industries, meaning found through faith and the advancement of the nation...) So agararianism and very nationalistic and traditional small countries, a real possiblity for after the impending collapse.
9. it is intentionally degenerate to enforce individualism and existentialism, destroy the white family unit, infiltrate and destroy the objective source of truth (ie the Church) and replace real cultural identities with universal niggatry, savagery and avarice so to perpetuate the global greed which fuels the world.
10. Christian, high church CofE Anglocatholicism, traditional theology with big focus on sacramental life and prayer...the religion of my forefathers

11. Jewish bolschevism that usurped the devine right of the Tsar and tried to replace Religion with a secular institution which could not truly provide the same social function, should have been based around volk if they attempted such a thing.
12. From what Ive written above it is probably clear Im pretty ethnonationalist, other than the universality of truth and faith (which do conform the race/culture) race/culture is an absoloute which necessarily defines man.
13. Good for europeans so long as it suites the people and not companies.
14. absloutely
15. Ive read Mike Ma's Harrasment Archetecture and I believe that violence may be the catylist which activates change, however the foundational element in change is an appropriate culture (think petri dish and bacterial culture). In Weimar Germany, the culture was pretty ready for change and the Beer hall putsch was a necessary effort (not entirely fruitful but...) so to gain ground for the NSDAP. I wont be hanging people, but Id put some bricks through windows. One problem with accelerationism is that it does cause alot of peripheral damage to the innocent (both by active harrassment of the vile persons, and the absurd social changes imposed by those vile persons) so it is a necessary evil, yet I will not waste my shot by firing first. I want to keep my life for family and farm, not to be a Brenton Tarrant and waste it all (love his manifesto tho, just dont do kill people untill the time is right...although that was not his philosophy)

Alot of this is from my work in progress manifesto so kinda long but it is the short version of my perspective

What do you consider makes propaganda effective? And are there any courses/materials available to learn about propaganda other than a marketing class

@AmericanFuturist (Man Redefined) thanks

1)Traditionalist, feudalist, luddite 2) High Church of England 3) Male 4) Anglo-Irish and Scottish 5) disboard