Also true

First draft constitution didnt have slaves

If that were the case, everyone would be considered a racist by our modern sense of morality.

The south were always behind

Uh yeah you do, and the same moral concepts have existed for much longer than this country

Not really, no.

Common law, civil law, law of war, etc

The same general guidelines have existed a long time

Abolitionism is a very recent concept born out of the Protestant reformation and the rise of freedom of interpretation and the definition of rights.

Common law allows for slavery, you know?

They wanted to free the slaves in 1776 my confused furry friend

Those ideals were strong even then

The entire concept of slavery being evil is a new concept birthed in the 1700’s and 1800’s.

Its not some insane concept

Read my statement, nibba.

Its not seen as just

Slavery began in the United States in the early 1600’s.

Slavery was banned in various countries centuries before us

Or what would become the United State.

Where all people are entitled to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness

No, the first country to officially abolish slavery was the United Kingdom in 1833z

You literally are unhappy the south was marginalized while they marginalized slaves

Only thirty years before the American Civil War.

They wanted to abolish it vefore america began bro

The south demanded slaves

Thats the only reason its in there at all

Otherwise we would have been first

Japan abolished slavery in 1590

China in 1723

You and your fucking asian history knowledge lol

>Japan.
>China.

Both countries guy

Pennsylvania Abolition Society formed in 1775

Ah, the countries famous for basically treating their population like slaves banned slaves first.

Again, read my statement, bruh.

1700’s was when abolitionism became a concept.

Except in japan

Gradual abolition of slavery in various states in 1700s

It didn’t catch on until the 1800’s.

Except in the north where it did?

And most of those places still would recognize slave property.