@Tralfaz

I’m definitely not in agreement there, I’m a big fan of NASB, but I’ve been really enjoying the way KJV is worded.

Excuse me if it's a dumb question, but are the deutorocanonicals an important part to have? They're catholic, yes?

The prots took it out because it goes against theit ideas

Like limbo

And the idea of saints

And prayer for the dead

The prots also remove 151 psalms

hmm

@Rumguzzler literally only prots dont have the deuterocanon

But let’s not dismiss the reasons why as something given no thought to

Looks like I'm going to have to go get an orthodox one too then

You can just buy the deuterocanon

Seperately

Probably

@Rumguzzler

Those specific ideas you mention can be argued to go against the character of God and contradict other ideas throughout scripture. And God cannot be contradicted. Super generalized argument but that’s the basic premise

Pfft

Contradict god

Bullshit

Well before it escalates lets have a moment of silence to honor the fact the we prefer to preserve and protect history rather than destroy and conceal it like the left

Again I think it can be argued. I’m not saying you’re and idiot and you’re going to hell, nothing of the sort. I think there’s a friendly argument and debate to be had over it

Yes lets throw away 1500 years of tradition because my sola scriptura

@Tralfaz are you a baptist

Nope dispensational

Are you a yec

Young earth creationist

Baptist is close, but still too “churchy” in terms of putting a building and gathering ahead of discipleship

Yes

Your earth yes

Young*

The world ia 4.5 billion years old

@Tralfaz

I disagree

Well you eithet choose science and god or ignorance and god

I’m a big fan of Kent Hovind. He’s got some wonderful explanations of how science and young earth are in perfect unison

You can believe in 4.5 billion year old earth and be a devout christian

Kent Hovind’s theology though I disagree with

@Tralfaz what about the dinosaur fossils

And the archeology

Everything can exist in perfect union