Message from @caykoh

Discord ID: 520854804537540608


2018-12-08 03:17:48 UTC  

so it should say "Yellow Vests, Do not let go of anything. Many Soldiers are against this government and are not fooled by what happens in this moment."

2018-12-08 03:18:03 UTC  

In addition to a parallel obstruction investigation. With today, I just cant ignore some advances that keep being revealed ... per the memo ...

"Second, Cohen provided the SCO with useful information concerning certain discrete Russia-related matters core to its investigation that he obtained by virtue of his regular contact with Company executives during the campaign. "

2018-12-08 03:20:34 UTC  

I have no problem with people like Cohen going to jail for breaking the law I just don't understand why Muller is investigating this and not the collision hes was charged too? The verdict is going to be guilty but its not going to haver anything to do with collusion.

2018-12-08 03:21:47 UTC  

It would be a nice surprise if Muller is cleaning house on both sides of the aisle but I doubt it.

2018-12-08 03:39:01 UTC  

Bro, if my memory is not mistaken, after Trump requested James Comey to not investigate Michael Flynn, and asked for his personal loyalty pledge, he dismissed him from his job shortly afterwards.

Jan. 27: Trump invited Comey to a dinner at the White House and told him "I need loyalty, I expect loyalty," according to Comey's prepared statement for the Senate.

Feb. 14: The day after Flynn resigned as Trump's National Security Advisor after misleading Mike Pence about his contacts with Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak, Trump asked Comey to drop the investigation into Flynn, per his statement: "I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go."

Feb. 15: The next day, Comey told Attorney General Jeff Sessions that Trump should stay out of the FBI probe, per Comey.

Sometime after March 20: Trump reportedly asked Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and NSA Director Michael Rogers to publicly push back on FBI probe, per the Washington Post. Sometime before March 22, Trump asked Coats if he could pressure Comey to stop investigating Flynn, per the Post.

May 10: Trump told Russian officials in the Oval Office that firing "nut job" Comey eased pressure on him, per the NYT.

Days after Comey was fired the FBI began to personally investigate Trump.

June 13: Sessions confirmed while testifying under oath he left Comey and Trump alone Feb. 14, but contradicted what Comey said about their conversation after the meeting — Sessions testified he had said he would tell the White House to follow protocol, Comey said Sessions did not reply.

June 14: The Post reported Mueller is investigating Trump for possible obstruction of justice.

2018-12-08 03:42:17 UTC  

It hella looks like activity of a public official atleast interested in interference, which isn't legal, and if there is any doubt, somone should investigate it, if not to find guilt, then to clear the accusations.

2018-12-08 04:51:30 UTC  

All I am saying is Mueller is investigating Trump for possible obstruction of justice, witch is not Mueller is investigating Trump for possible colluding with Russia.

2018-12-08 04:51:37 UTC  

The unraveling is happening

2018-12-08 05:00:17 UTC  

@woodchuck00 Again...

... per the memo ...

"Second, Cohen provided the SCO with useful information concerning certain discrete Russia-related matters core to its investigation that he obtained by virtue of his regular contact with Company executives during the campaign. "

He most definitly is.

2018-12-08 06:07:28 UTC  

"discrete Russia-related matters core to its investigation" that seems like a weird way of saying Russian collusion, is it not possible that they are using cryptic sentences to prepare you for disappointment?

2018-12-08 06:44:46 UTC  

People still think Trump Russia collusion happened?

2018-12-08 06:45:20 UTC  

I thought that was just a 2017 trend

2018-12-08 06:45:57 UTC  

Many people do yes

2018-12-08 06:47:02 UTC  

Interesting

2018-12-08 06:48:29 UTC  

Well they would be making an assumption that such conclusion would be disappointing to me, and I dont think they know I exist...lol. I'm kidding about that, kind of.

It's a safe educated guess to say that they're choice of words is certain to be referring to investigation of either the government of Russia making efforts to disrupt our processes, atleast electoral ones, and/or the campaign of Donald Trump having participated in a conspiracy in respect to such efforts

2018-12-08 06:48:35 UTC  

I suspect the people at the top of the intelligence community know that russia's game was never to steal/blackmail the president, only to raise questions about their ability to do so

2018-12-08 06:49:48 UTC  

Their campaign was effectively orchestrated and russia acomplished what they set out to do.

2018-12-08 06:50:13 UTC  

It simply comes off as a huge distraction to me that makes me wonder, why the need to make it a focus?

2018-12-08 06:50:35 UTC  

Because this is something which cannot be ignored

2018-12-08 06:50:50 UTC  

People need to have faith in their democracy or it will not function.

2018-12-08 06:51:02 UTC  

"It" being the uk investigation ?

2018-12-08 06:51:11 UTC  

Minus the uk

2018-12-08 06:51:15 UTC  

That w as a typo

2018-12-08 06:51:15 UTC  

The muller investigation yes

2018-12-08 06:51:21 UTC  

Yes

2018-12-08 06:51:31 UTC  

It was given the widest scope possible because they didnt want any doubt to remain in people's minds

2018-12-08 06:51:50 UTC  

Have you ever heard Mueller speak?

2018-12-08 06:51:57 UTC  

So what happens when it concludes with no collusion between trump and Russia?

2018-12-08 06:52:00 UTC  

They hardly saying shit dude

2018-12-08 06:52:03 UTC  

Certainly no one will doubt that

2018-12-08 06:52:29 UTC  

They’ll say, thanks for trinity Mueller, we 100% believe you

2018-12-08 06:52:38 UTC  

trying*

2018-12-08 06:52:42 UTC  

Well I would assume at that point even more damnjng evidence will be produced related to just russia efforts

2018-12-08 06:52:42 UTC  

Doubt it

2018-12-08 06:52:59 UTC  

How they feel about it is irrelevant. What matters is their faith in the government and the institutions.

2018-12-08 06:53:22 UTC  

Are you saying that in terms of their POV?

2018-12-08 06:53:32 UTC  

Or that’s how things should be for all?

2018-12-08 06:53:51 UTC  

Im saying that from the view point of the government trying to keep the people on board with democracy

2018-12-08 06:54:28 UTC  

How they feel about the outcome of the investigation does not matter. What matters is that the government has shown they are willing to police themselves no matter who is accused of a crime.

2018-12-08 06:55:03 UTC  

This will not always be the case, but it is a very public example which will remain in people's minds for decades after it is over.

2018-12-08 06:55:26 UTC  

It’s only happening because it’s allowed to happen