you know what always annoys me, since we're on the subject of God and Christianity and stuff

and infidels will pay for it

and everybody else has to stay outside in the eternal shithole

Webfoot that is actually true lol

when atheists try to apply human knowledge and logic to God

Hell is literally a garbage heap

xd if god created everything who created god haha checkmate christian!!

lollll

aquinas got ya bruh

creation came only from the creator

there cannot be an infinitude of causes, there must therefore be an uncaused cause

God does not exist inside the universe, but outside of it

you cannot create something if you are within its grasp

if God can be created that means he's limited. That logic doesn't work

Yee, beyond all 9 dimensions

exactly

god has no beginning, suck it dawkins

Dawkins a Jew?

nah

just molested a bit by a priest

)))Reeee(((

God is paradoxical, but that also does not mean anything, it simply means we have come to a shortcoming in our abilities to work things out

True

he's been decent at realizin "oh crap islam is a lot worse than what we ever had here"

Islam is a Christian heresy

so ofc it is

inquisition plz

Dawky needs to be a man and get some therapy so he can take the final red pill

put on your dating site profile: "because every Ferdinand needs his Isabella"

Hahaha

I find it interesting how Dawkins is completely right on the biological aspect of humans, his books are brilliant in that sense yet he doesn't realize that none of that disproves God

It just furthers our knowledge of the God's creation

^

i once had a science teacher who told me something wise

science cannot prove or disprove God

so don't try

the fallacy is "category error"

there's a useful tell when dealing with the "new atheist" crowd

one useful tell for charlatans is that they change the meaning of words on you

Yeah God is not measurable by instruments unless you somehow end up with Jesus in your room and he lets you take his hair and send it to a lab lmao

"there is NO evidence for anything remotely religious," they say, and then they bait-and-switch that by "evidence," they specifically meant SCIENTIFIC evidence