And I did not. I only made it clear as it why the South was opposed to Lincoln’s actions by giving an allegorical example.
That happened before he did anything
Which makes the argument: The south was justified in their actions because of what happened after
Which is why I argued what I did
It illustrates your hypocrisy boots
You were arguing north is bad south good but justified the south with the same shit you shamed the north with
If I have awootism its weaponized
That’s because the North is bad and gets away with a hell of a lot more shit than the south does.
Wahhh
It's corruption dems vs racist farmer dems
The south got punished
The North doesn’t get the bands of people who call them “evil racists” like the South does, even though the North was pretty racist as well.
Idk
You should.
Pretty sure all Republicans get that
Especially now
Wish granted
No, it’s heavily used against Southerners.
Specifically southerners.
Go to bed boots youre drunk
The Democrats who started the KKK didn't get that
And almost universally against southerners.
Well they lost a war
No, this isn’t even about the war.
They dont really get celebrated for that
Lol
They lost their way of life
The south has been universally shat upon for centuries.
They have been universally shit
The southern economy had been ruined by the union and subsequent war
Even before the nation came about, Northerners had strongly negative opinions of southerners and considered them “lazy.”
Lazy enough to start a war over slaves
The south has been the proverbial punching bag for much of the country.
Now its California
Only recently was it California.
Im blocked stop replying to me
How can you even see me typing?
Lmao
The problem being is that the South has always been treated like shit by the North.
It’s why conflict was an inevitability.
