Its a silly argument

Especially when Obama was the last person to do it

We can't learn from our mistakes because Abe and the North were perfect and the South were just hicks

I didnt say that

I said then doesnt affect now

Unless Trump is doing it and you are protesting that

You're whole point regarding Abe's actions were that what he did was constitutional

Well Obama did it too so...

Yeah it made it constitutional

Boots and I are saying that it is wrong and shouldn't be ignored

What do you want done?

For the president to go through Congress like they're supposed to

Very simple

Except they dont have to anymore

Executive orders are different from completely bypassing legislation

If not indict Obama

Really who is doing it you want persecuted?

In a case should it happen again, the president if he does so, on a level that violates the constitution.

So basically you are just randomly bitch that bad things are bad

Ignoring that boots was using it against the north now

And not for the reason you were defending it

If the president somehow manages to go over Congress to make an unconstitutional decision that affects the rights below the federal level, the situation should be dealt with instead of passed over

This isn't rocket science. Hell, it's not even mental math

Again thats not what it was about

Boots was arguing that Republicans now are scum because of that one instance

And then the topic changed to Lincoln's policy

No that was part of his entire argument

And that's the part I'm talking about

So then you agree that Republicans now are "dirty Yankees? "

For that one reason?

So I'm supposed to apply today's political spectrum to the old one, even though they barely line up

Thats what boots was doing lol

I'm not boots

But that was the argument

And I did not. I only made it clear as it why the South was opposed to Lincoln’s actions by giving an allegorical example.

That happened before he did anything

Which makes the argument: The south was justified in their actions because of what happened after

Which is why I argued what I did

It illustrates your hypocrisy boots

You were arguing north is bad south good but justified the south with the same shit you shamed the north with

If I have awootism its weaponized