The definition is melt: make or become liquefied by heating.

By definition it didn’t melt

Now, if they're trying to bring around conspiracy theories, WTC7 would be a better place to start...

Regardless of HOW things happened they still happened

But that’s sorta ruined by the fact structural steel never actually melts

Oh it’s September 11th over there

I forgot you’re in the past

m'controlled demolition

Lol

Let’s be real tho

The fuck is up with building 7

its 9/11 here too

I think it was building 7

Yup

Building 7

It’s super sketchy

And so was the damage on the pentagon

And the fact that the most secure building in your country

iirc it fell AFTER at least one of the main two

Only caught footage from a ticket booth

The fucks up with that

Most of the theories around 9/11 are dumb except those two

Those two don’t make sense

also building 7 caught fire from debris from the North tower

I mean...

Any time you wind up with a decent question like that

it normally gets crowded out by mantras and screeching lunacy.

Honestly though

How did the pentagon not get footage of it coming

JEWS DID WTC REEEE
*INHALES*
JET FUEL DOESN'T MELT STEEL BEAMS REEEEE
*INHALES*

https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/design/a3524/4278874/

Jews did wtc tho

Shut up, Adolf.

Over 9000 jews weren't at work on 9/11

But yeah, I mean

https://www.nist.gov/publications/final-report-collapse-world-trade-center-building-7-federal-building-and-fire-safety-0

How did it catch fire tho

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnLcUxV1dPo

"WTC 7 collapsed because of fires fueled by office furnishings. It did not collapse from explosives or from diesel fuel fires."